From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: libxml2-python Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:17:24 +0100 Message-ID: <201303141517.24318.andreas@enge.fr> References: <201303062343.03155.andreas@enge.fr> <201303081313.03952.andreas@enge.fr> <87fvzyt8pd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34799) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UG8yR-00088w-0i for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:17:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UG8yN-0001uY-1Q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:17:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87fvzyt8pd.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org Am Donnerstag, 14. M=C3=A4rz 2013 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s: > Andreas Enge skribis: > > I think it would be better to change it to "glibc" (which is what both > > of us thought naturally that it was already). I think this occurrence > > needs to be changed: ./gnu/packages/base.scm:1091: ("libc" > > ,glibc-final)))) in %final-inputs, and probably other places to be > > coherent. > Well, I=E2=80=99d rather keep it as is to avoid needless churn, and becau= se the > =E2=80=98g=E2=80=99 is really implicit anyway. It is not very intuitive, since all the packages are called "glibc*", and=20 we usually use the package name as key in the hash tables. So one should be= =20 coherent in making the "g" explicit or not. In any case, this is not a big= =20 problem. Andreas