From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: Netpbm Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 23:40:23 +0100 Message-ID: <201301202340.23178.andreas@enge.fr> References: <201301191803.17290.andreas@enge.fr> <201301201631.57914.andreas@enge.fr> <87vcarqzgy.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary-01=_XJH/QV4BiqR/los" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34623) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx3Z4-000866-NX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:40:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tx3Yy-0004ae-Lo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:40:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87vcarqzgy.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org --Boundary-01=_XJH/QV4BiqR/los Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s: > > In unknown file: > > ?: 0 [mkdir "/nix/store/mv7v3y702k1yfml8067gn15r3n6pzjxm-user- > >=20 > > environment///nix/store/agjc4rdsvi4wvbz6dymgid5pb85nqcf7- > > netpbm-10.61.01/VERSION" ...] > > ERROR: In procedure mkdir: > > ERROR: In procedure mkdir: No such file or directory >=20 > Hmm, that still means there=E2=80=99s a bug with top-level file handling = in > (guix union). I=E2=80=99ll investigate later. Well, after deleting the extraneous files, everything works well. > A few comments: > This comment should be just above. > The comment should be above, and you could instead write: Great, I am always writing my comments below... But at least this is easy=20 to fix. > > + (license gpl2) >=20 > It seems to be more complex than this. Some files in lib/ have this: >=20 > ** Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and > its ** documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, > provided ** that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and > that both that ** copyright notice and this permission notice appear in > supporting ** documentation. This software is provided "as is" without > express or ** implied warranty. >=20 > Others in analyzer/ have GPLv2+, others have this: >=20 > All work has been contributed to the public domain by its authors. Should it not be possible to relicense all of these under gpl2, so that the= =20 license field is still correct? Anyway, we cannot track the licenses of all= =20 files with only one field... > Debian lists a number of other issues, including unknown-status and > non-free parts:=20 > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/n/netpbm-free/netpbm-fr > ee_10.0-12.2/libnetpbm10.copyright This is more annoying, I will investigate and try to remove non-free parts. Andreas --Boundary-01=_XJH/QV4BiqR/los Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am Sonntag,= 20. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s:

> > I= n unknown file:

> > = ?: 0 [mkdir "/nix/store/mv7v3y702k1yfml8067gn15r3n6pzjxm-user-

> > <= /p>

> > e= nvironment///nix/store/agjc4rdsvi4wvbz6dymgid5pb85nqcf7-

> > n= etpbm-10.61.01/VERSION" ...]

> > E= RROR: In procedure mkdir:

> > E= RROR: In procedure mkdir: No such file or directory

>

> Hmm, t= hat still means there=E2=80=99s a bug with top-level file handling in

> (guix = union). I=E2=80=99ll investigate later.

&nb= sp;

Well, after= deleting the extraneous files, everything works well.

&nb= sp;

> A few = comments:

> This c= omment should be just above.

> The co= mment should be above, and you could instead write:

&nb= sp;

Great, I am= always writing my comments below... But at least this is easy to fix.

&nb= sp;

> > += (license gpl2)

>

> It see= ms to be more complex than this. Some files in lib/ have this:

>

> ** P= ermission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and

> its **= documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted,

> provid= ed ** that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and

> that b= oth that ** copyright notice and this permission notice appear in

> suppor= ting ** documentation. This software is provided "as is" without=

> expres= s or ** implied warranty.

>

> Others= in analyzer/ have GPLv2+, others have this:

>

> All = work has been contributed to the public domain by its authors.

&nb= sp;

Should it n= ot be possible to relicense all of these under gpl2, so that the license fi= eld is still correct? Anyway, we cannot track the licenses of all files wit= h only one field...

&nb= sp;

> Debian= lists a number of other issues, including unknown-status and

> non-fr= ee parts:

> http:/= /packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/n/netpbm-free/netpbm-fr

> ee_10.= 0-12.2/libnetpbm10.copyright

&nb= sp;

This is mor= e annoying, I will investigate and try to remove non-free parts.

&nb= sp;

Andreas

&nb= sp;

--Boundary-01=_XJH/QV4BiqR/los--