Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:

> Another thing we can do to avoid duplicated work, is to commit and push

> individual packages as soon as we have them. For instance, as soon as

> you have a working libextractor, go ahead and push it.

That is what I do. But I am not fond of pushing packages for which I would still like to add more inputs; it is possible to push libextractor without lots of optional dependencies. This is what my proposed patch for vorbis-tools does, there is a FIXME explaining which inputs are missing. But then there is a higher risk of forgetting to add them.

Otherwise said, currently I am doing a depth-first exploration of the dependency graph, but one could do something closer to breadth-first.

> Or maybe we should use an Org file somewhere, or a wiki, or some sort of

> locally-hosted Web 2.0 task management thing.

Anything would be fine for me as long as it is easy. Maybe a wiki would be easiest for the time being.

Andreas