From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: Obsolete packages listed as available Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:37:10 +0100 Message-ID: <201301031737.10550.andreas@enge.fr> References: <201301031421.44877.andreas@enge.fr> <87d2xm5nk2.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary-01=_2Ob5Qx+qAQKfuH/" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44407) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TqnnC-000573-DN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:37:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqnn9-0001r9-Ix for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:37:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87d2xm5nk2.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org --Boundary-01=_2Ob5Qx+qAQKfuH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s: > I suppose the file sasl.scm still exists along with the other files. > Even if it=E2=80=99s not under version control, the module-listing code in > distro.scm will stumble upon it, and thus list any packages that it > exports. Yes and no - it still existed in the guix installation directory, but not=20 in the source directory. After removing it, the extra package disappeared.= =20 Thanks! Would it make sense to first empty $PREFIX/share/guile/site/2.0 before=20 installing the files during "make install"? Andreas --Boundary-01=_2Ob5Qx+qAQKfuH/ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am Donnerst= ag, 3. Januar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s:

> I supp= ose the file sasl.scm still exists along with the other files.

> Even i= f it=E2=80=99s not under version control, the module-listing code in

> distro= =2Escm will stumble upon it, and thus list any packages that it

> export= s.

&nb= sp;

Yes and no = =2D it still existed in the guix installation directory, but not in the sou= rce directory. After removing it, the extra package disappeared. Thanks!

&nb= sp;

Would it ma= ke sense to first empty $PREFIX/share/guile/site/2.0 before installing the = files during "make install"?

&nb= sp;

Andreas

&nb= sp;

--Boundary-01=_2Ob5Qx+qAQKfuH/--