From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Gran Subject: bug#21677: [Bug-guile-ncurses] Guile-NCurses test failure when built against NCurses 6.0 Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 16:50:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1933042933.1958255.1445100616496.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <87612asnft.fsf@gnu.org> <1683863730.3263018.1444758001236.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Reply-To: Mike Gran Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34063) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnUkB-0003TF-4m for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:54:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnUk6-00059B-5A for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:54:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35573) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnUk6-00058m-1E for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:54:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnUk5-0005Kv-Mj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:54:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1683863730.3263018.1444758001236.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: "21677@debbugs.gnu.org" <21677@debbugs.gnu.org>, "bug-guile-ncurses@gnu.org" >>>> Guile-NCurses 1.6 has one test failure when built against NCurses > 6.0: >>>> >>> >>>> FAIL: getwin/putwin: putwin >>>> ERROR: getwin/putwin: getwin - arguments: ((srfi-34 # >>>> &curses-wrong-type-arg-error [arg: #f expected-type: window] >> e7d210>)) >>> >>>> Any ideas? Okay. I've tried some of the combinations of Guile, Ncurses and OS and getwin/putwin is broken in different ways with different combinations. No one uses those functions anyway, as far as I can tell. I think the plan is to put out a guile-ncurses 1.7 that just eliminates it. And then soon, put out a guile-ncurses 2.0 that will require guile-2.0.11+ and ncurses 6.0+, and re-evaluate whether it is worth it to fix those functions. I'll try to put out guile-ncurses 1.7 this week. -Mike