From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Vollmert Subject: bug#36069: Menu-based installer unusable through noVNC Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:13:01 +0200 Message-ID: <17584F6F-7F50-4BFF-9A7B-206CF4596A79@vllmrt.net> References: <87r28848q1.fsf@gnu.org> <875zpjwx88.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33258) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1haays-0003zB-DQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:14:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1haayq-0003fI-Bj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:14:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44367) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1haayo-0003cF-7g for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:14:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1haayo-0007ko-2M for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:14:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <875zpjwx88.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 36069-done@debbugs.gnu.org > On 5. Jun 2019, at 23:14, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >=20 > Robert Vollmert skribis: >=20 >>> On 5. Jun 2019, at 12:39, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>>=20 >>> I=E2=80=99ve never used noVNC, but doesn=E2=80=99t it allow you to = zoom out or >>> something? The kernel (KMS) knows what it=E2=80=99s doing, so it = seems to me >>> that the problem is that noVNC doesn=E2=80=99t realize what the = actual screen >>> size is. Does the Internet have something to say wrt. noVNC vs. = kmscon? >>=20 >> I don=E2=80=99t seem to get any controls to resize the display; in = previous >> situations it has seemed to switch modes correctly automatically. = That >> said, I=E2=80=99m happy to believe that the bug is with noVNC =E2=80=94= I=E2=80=99ve reported >> it with arpnetworks and will pass it on to noVNC once I know which >> version is running. >=20 > Alright, let us know how it goes so we can happily close the bug. :-) It turns out arpnetworks are running an older forked version of noVNC, so this might well have been fixed in the meantime. Not solved, but I don=E2=80=99t intend to pursue this further at this point, will close. = At least it=E2=80=99s on record if it shows up again. Cheers Rob