From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sirgazil Subject: bug#36100: Jami leaks memory Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:20:26 -0500 Message-ID: <16b4cb481c8.bec2698023794.900017298306389181@zoho.com> References: <16b135f47a5.c48c9e1512716.4579175065592128011@zoho.com> <878su7xamv.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36682) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hb6vn-00046g-MR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 13:21:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hb6vm-0003SO-Oc for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 13:21:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48700) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hb6vm-0003S7-LW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 13:21:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hb6vm-0007rh-D6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 13:21:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <878su7xamv.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 36100 <36100@debbugs.gnu.org> ---- On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 07:15:36 -0500 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s = wrote ---- > Hi sirgazil,=20 > =20 > sirgazil skribis:=20 > =20 > > When I run Jami in the GNU system installed with Guix, I see that its = process called ".gnome-ring-rea" starts using around 36 MiB, but then incre= ases over time at slow pace. After some hours, I notice it reaches 1 GiB of= memory usage. I have to finalize the process to release memory.=20 > =20 > Do you think it=E2=80=99s a Guix-specific issue?=20 > =20 > I would expect it to not be Guix-specific. Could you report the issue= =20 > upstream?=20 Oh, I think one of my messages about this issue didn't arrived. The leak in= the version available in Guix is known and fixed upstream. I thought that maybe this bug report could be used as a reminder to update = the package definition of Jami in Guix to a version that fixes the leak?