From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Self Subject: bug#34565: ungoogled-chromium contains Widevine DRM Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:39:12 -0800 Message-ID: <1550623152.12316.5.camel@jxself.org> References: <1550547897.31222.1.camel@jxself.org> <20190219070601.GA8273@jasmine.lan> <1550582906.5431.7.camel@jxself.org> <20190219144342.GA2688@jasmine.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-pzz+1IqxJ3m8isCv+19H" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37365) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwFwH-0006g9-CC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 19:40:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwFvr-00008t-7G for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 19:40:25 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56164) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwFve-00004w-NT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 19:40:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gwFve-00063i-Dd for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 19:40:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20190219144342.GA2688@jasmine.lan> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 34565@debbugs.gnu.org --=-pzz+1IqxJ3m8isCv+19H Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Based on=C2=A0http://issues.guix.info/issue/28004#2=C2=A0it is disabled at = build time; but not removed. The person said they thought this was FSDG compliant but a reading of "the distro must contain no DRM" from the FSDG could be taken to mean the distro still "contains" it, since it's still within the source code of the program. "Disabled by default" shouldn't be good enough IMHO; build flags should not be used to hide freedom problems. The source code represents what the software *is*, not the build flags. --=-pzz+1IqxJ3m8isCv+19H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAABCgAGBQJcbKGwAAoJEJ0NsxtUWjGYmGAP+wTXJ80sklDLx8lp9VPxPELo Uhu4JVBHN53JNEe/I1Q5J5Xu9AzFGbThNoGleL+CPmXGBQVym5KI+2rNQ/LHfNym qvOGn9twPY7jCh/RhZUt7bSmm0kcKQFdfWAQDb2FaJO1dOEtV9pooWxwMwjgOzNw 1FINrdBHdDfWtjvQ2vafmQAVbjaqK9mjNTW4sE26GGKOgscRsD3uoFm2HQFEptku Md/2I6te4KZnLm+320DGvSgWKcC5AQwVsEtHcTB21LfAk4rGZwn8XGtdH+Xagsm2 NVKevpYDtepTrxwQuxY1Cd1NSQ0VaDcCs8DrKX6SZaWCmQiXKSrvp+yhEX3P69di orldJkCqFLNGymGEmzyQ6LPaSYIlcpFHdxZQQ7kop/z7tUyxBdsQeMjPMcyHWLt3 +OkDHGDO6jBQHxPhxsUsAK9gqCe5xW7zWk5BQZzj59WurajTXaJXR/lYlHzs+EAG PS6VQ9RQZ0dQQWObag8HbuTW2xyRwO8xFY/o0u7+r2iB5zg26BjJhFELouP0oT2P omcEgF8Y+4OWgnO0FE7U5M+74f6ACNKQ++PrLNw9dkur89dHIsvDd3MCp6yEuKfq mG2zJX+P+Jg+hhPVDXA99jaJ3b3Uw85+Ldvrz+QLEuXT6+z5oH8d59RfgYTdPL2l HnGfn+otxauemJ2jE30H =zN5H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-pzz+1IqxJ3m8isCv+19H--