From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id kK61BiLlO2GZMwEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 01:07:14 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id EFWTAiLlO2EbFQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 23:07:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D76F712825 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 01:07:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57124 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mOpc0-0006Nx-Ov for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 19:07:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mOpbs-0006LX-1X for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 19:07:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55990) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mOpbq-0005ek-GP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 19:07:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mOpbq-0002mm-99 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 19:07:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49921: go-1.16 build failing on aarch64: "fatal error: runtime.newosproc" Resent-From: Thiago Jung Bauermann Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 23:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49921 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: iskarian@mgsn.dev Cc: 49921@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49921-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49921.163131521310690 (code B ref 49921); Fri, 10 Sep 2021 23:07:02 +0000 Received: (at 49921) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2021 23:06:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39303 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mOpbg-0002mM-Kv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 19:06:52 -0400 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([95.128.36.41]:33182 helo=ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mOpbb-0002m0-QS for 49921@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 19:06:51 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F348AAA; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 01:06:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:date:subject:subject :from:from:received:received:received; s=dkim20160331; t= 1631315200; x=1633129601; bh=RAcfmz0tompY90evF1HeTJtXjm4FLSFX1Tt WAWiT6Qo=; b=AlsHYyjmlZjRdUOTdaflLSYMM2FtDEbFj8Hb5S2SipNvD80X159 orr2hwtHEAU1NYB9gy6qwsmqZnzNAKkIbLjUYgRLimuNX90P2XRg80b3g5mDuX/o o+CWg5+epltn5H15Ef3Fg/ol5/zxTAa8GDV3d+OtM69QgXYdQAzJuNExrVN+IzOb v/iOBYB/uVzDf2YLtiDaTHm5f9aiBk5LjckEodSJgZu5BKpDBraNT9yAKOx0WdgF hbnC/hM8H0A/phjjlVIZkET9YIVo6llsdXr4tXjpR4lrEooD3K5Jt+Inz7RrSdUT vbarLFUHbHe/6tfh45htfUGUOOM4ni7Te1jyBIWBvvKw/OrHE3P5GlmxqiR7c9kq j8KdymRW82PFkFnkQEnqlRbYjC9x2Yr97bQpk2KD6zelM8IdpPBWW/yG7fd5Uhbj ujubI/Av5N+li7Gvty/cpX//Y7Zz4pDkXLTMAj2fagi0qaeQu3y55zc8w2X7XZdS TmvcUeb1E/kkY5Sw3eIeBCyFnHKBzHGiUjlwoLnZjac0hB0tbFByOLjNRUscpBO7 jiYYlsvzkgjFtozy6Vy47lOHEi7Sk/RECOJtXMvd8U5mx37dwE31FOyDxi4z7+Va HS/lVb7XCDrsAJJiDV7tKzMqrRdENBMxWr4iff5migYAsWpwc8NrU3ag= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mykolab.com Received: from ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xgoli2rYMsHd; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 01:06:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx002.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.2]) by ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF77A532; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 01:06:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ext-subm003.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.3]) by int-mx002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5046E540C; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 01:06:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 20:06:34 -0300 Message-ID: <12949187.JfoJOkFrob@popigai> In-Reply-To: <2cce05f2762e6bb5beadc677a34f00c4@mgsn.dev> References: <1787046.58CDggCRW2@popigai> <86v93izufn.fsf@mgsn.dev> <2cce05f2762e6bb5beadc677a34f00c4@mgsn.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" Reply-to: Thiago Jung Bauermann From: Thiago Jung Bauermann via Bug reports for GNU Guix X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.00 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; none X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D76F712825 X-Spam-Score: -4.00 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: SFRZBr2BzBMZ Hello Sarah, Em sexta-feira, 10 de setembro de 2021, =C3=A0s 19:14:06 -03, iskarian@mgsn= =2Edev=20 escreveu: > Hi Thiago, >=20 > (Re-sent due to missing Cc.) >=20 > September 10, 2021 3:06 PM, "Thiago Jung Bauermann"=20 wrote: > > Hello Sarah, > >=20 > > Em quinta-feira, 2 de setembro de 2021, =C3=A0s 15:47:08 -03, Sarah > > Morgensen > >=20 > > escreveu: > >> I think this might be related to [0], although if it's true that CI > >> uses > >> native builders for aarch64 now, I have no idea. > >=20 > > The CI has two native aarch64 builders (which also do armhf, despite > > bugs 43513 and 43591): dover and overdrive1. > >=20 > > It also uses half of the x86_64 builders (hydra-guix-*) for emulated > > builds of aarch64 and armhf, as can be seen here: > >=20 > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/tree/hydra/berli > > n-nodes.scm#n143 > Thanks for the explanation. Is there a way to tell CI (or Guix itself) > that certain packages shouldn't be built under emulation? I don=E2=80=99t know. That would certainly be useful, though. To be honest, my experience in the past couple of months with emulated=20 builds for powerpc64le-linux wasn=E2=80=99t good, so I asked for it to be t= urned=20 off. =2D-=20 Thanks, Thiago