From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id oLKSMxw0r15+BwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 03 May 2020 21:14:04 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id YEcEMSY0r15nKwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 03 May 2020 21:14:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2359943705 for ; Sun, 3 May 2020 21:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53108 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVLwC-0005KS-Um for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 17:14:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51352) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVLw2-0005HN-TD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 17:14:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46644) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVLw2-0003F9-IO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 17:14:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jVLw2-00020W-AH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 17:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#41037: documentation for application developers? Resent-From: Bruno Haible Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 May 2020 21:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41037 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 41037-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41037.15885404367698 (code B ref 41037); Sun, 03 May 2020 21:14:02 +0000 Received: (at 41037) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2020 21:13:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58190 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jVLvs-000201-Rd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 17:13:56 -0400 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.163]:19398) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jVLvq-0001zr-7k for 41037@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 17:13:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1588540428; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=a19y3CIpRmyStIiVbLwqBaON5dBGZXcUulAKNG4lZLY=; b=qyWWo5JM9BnGf8Wcy4CIplXt44rZkhDQtoWoC85CKM4RN4egiItLqaeliWT/fzsnbI NXrnFsioua5jhgS8p4Ymdm/m+E5WAd8cd7DF07VxA8MrM1dL46xboKeG7SZvnE+IYEQ9 smBa0VmfF8AjAmVKkXGDQVegibokaZwzcivfoeJ3h9DPmATmSKOrF80kQk5ZD4AbTapW ELCuD/hLS6JKuF9Bgf2reR1vuvV2JmaTV4Jnt/MEAKZb0O1gV9Xn9s+vbhrwnPYZLagK eAcu5sY2vI01d6dwzkJdxLeDkf60hxCifTLgTrJKz9pn49zBA8y8ZcOFSr4pGOm5ywzZ YYpg== X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH+AHjwLuWOH6fzxfs=" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from bruno.haible.de by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 46.6.2 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id j093d3w43LDlqYW (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve X9_62_prime256v1 with 256 ECDH bits, eq. 3072 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Sun, 3 May 2020 23:13:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Bruno Haible Date: Sun, 03 May 2020 23:13:46 +0200 Message-ID: <10121112.yT0VcRYgiK@omega> User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-177-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <87pnbkvio0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1614037.PG1mooiXeX@omega> <87pnbkvio0.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 41037@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: 1.49 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=clisp.org header.s=strato-dkim-0002 header.b=qyWWo5JM; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 2001:470:142::17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [1.49 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.4940514940795]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:142::/48:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.14), country: US(-0.00), ip: 2001:470:142::17(-0.49)]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[clisp.org:s=strato-dkim-0002]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[clisp.org:-]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:2001:470:142::/48, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bruno@clisp.org,bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[gnu.org:url]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[clisp.org]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[8]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: 1482P8+e2Mhd Hi Ludo, > > I would expect to find these issues discussed, at least: > > - hard-coded program names like /bin/pwd >=20 > These should be avoided; it=E2=80=99s not Guix-specific, but the problem = is > obviously more acute here. /bin/pwd exists on all other Unix systems; so de facto it _is_ Guix specific. > > - where is /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ? >=20 > It=E2=80=99s in the glibc package: >=20 > ls $(guix build glibc | grep '[0-9]$')/lib >=20 > What=E2=80=99s your use case? So, the consequence is that a Guix user cannot send an executable to another Guix user and expect it to be runnable on the other machine. This too is Guix specific; maybe it is already documented? > > - libtool, ldconfig issues >=20 > =E2=80=98ldconfig=E2=80=99 is not used. Nothing special for Libtool. > Do you have something in mind? I wanted to have background information regarding ldconfig and shared library caches, in order to investigate bug#41038 . Bruno