From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: bug#26695: openssh password-authentication? should be #f by default Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 09:09:51 -0700 Message-ID: <01F8858C-D359-42CA-96A6-45F6C4A3B80C@gmail.com> References: <87k264tx8m.fsf@dustycloud.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44735) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d48T9-000833-F6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:10:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d48T4-0000Np-UN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:10:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46711) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d48T4-0000NZ-Qj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:10:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d48T4-00031V-Fe for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:10:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87k264tx8m.fsf@dustycloud.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 26695@debbugs.gnu.org, cwebber@dustycloud.org On April 28, 2017 7:37:13 AM PDT, Christopher Allan Webber wrote: >Our default permits password authentication for the openssh service >(and >the others it seems) by default in Guix=2E This is somewhat dangerous >because this is a much easier to break in this way, and some users >might >not assume the default is reasonably safe=2E If users really want >password-authentication, they should turn it on explicitly=2E +1=2E Although it means the keys will have to be copied by another mean th= an the "ssh-copy-id" script=2E Maybe the configuration could accept the pub= lic key? :) I haven't checked if this is already possible=2E