From: Peter Brett <peter@peter-b.co.uk>
To: guile-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Multiple parallel environments
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:12:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <we1mtz0udztz.fsf@ssclt003.ee.surrey.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87r5vyl3cr.fsf@gnu.org
ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello,
>
> Peter Brett <peter@peter-b.co.uk> writes:
>
>> What I'd like to do is something like the following:
>>
>> * Load system config
>> * Load user config
>> * Save environment ==> [0]
>>
>> * User opens /path/to/a/file
>> * Load config from /path/to/a/editor.conf
>> * Edit, edit, hack, hack.
>>
>> * User opens /path/to/another/file
>> * Save environment ==> [1]
>> * Restore environment <== [0]
>> * Load config from /path/to/another/editor.conf
>> * Edit, edit, hack, hack.
>
> Before answering, I'd like to make sure I understand what you want to
> achieve.
Okay. Just to clarify, this is an instance where Guile is being used
as an extension language for an application written predominantly in C
and GTK+2.0.
> What do you mean by "environment"? All the global variables associated
> with a given file in the editor?
Sort of. The whole of Guile's top level bindings at that point. (The
per-directory config is literally loaded as a Scheme script, so it
could define and redefine functions and variables at will).
> What do you mean by "save"? Serialize to a file the "environment"
> associated with a file (or the difference compared to the initial
> environment)?
It doesn't need to be serialised -- I don't even need to be able to
get a C pointer to it! -- it just needs to be "stashed" somewhere so
that I can "rewind" Guile's toplevel bindings to that point at a later
time.
Essentially, I want each directory/"project" to be able to define its
own functions, include its own modules etc. without stomping over
another project that happens to be loaded into the application at the
same time.
I hope that makes the problem clear as mud. ;-)
[ One horrible idea was to abuse scm_from_locale_symbol() and
scm_c_call_with_current_module() in some horrendous way. How likely
would this be to break cataclysmically in Guile > 1.8.x? ]
Best wishes,
Peter
--
Peter Brett <peter@peter-b.co.uk>
Remote Sensing Research Group
Surrey Space Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-30 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-29 17:34 Multiple parallel environments Peter Brett
2009-07-30 13:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-07-30 14:12 ` Peter Brett [this message]
2009-07-30 14:45 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-07-30 15:19 ` Peter Brett
2009-07-30 15:45 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=we1mtz0udztz.fsf@ssclt003.ee.surrey.ac.uk \
--to=peter@peter-b.co.uk \
--cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).