From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Greg Troxel <gdt@ir.bbn.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user
Subject: Re: guile-gtk
Date: 17 Nov 2004 14:27:50 -0500
Message-ID: <rmiu0rocm2x.fsf@fnord.ir.bbn.com>
References: <1100551262.19830.242.camel@localhost>
	<419A592F.3080301@ossau.uklinux.net>
	<rmid5ydk10v.fsf@fnord.ir.bbn.com> <419B5A9E.6060408@ccrma>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100719717 26250 80.91.229.6 (17 Nov 2004 19:28:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:28:37 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Guile Users <guile-user@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 17 20:28:26 2004
Return-path: <guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CUVTe-00083l-00
	for <guile-user@m.gmane.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:28:26 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CUVcS-0007Ek-TX
	for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:37:32 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CUVcK-0007Co-Nk
	for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:37:24 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CUVcJ-0007Bj-JV
	for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:37:23 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUVcJ-0007BX-FP
	for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:37:23 -0500
Original-Received: from [192.1.100.210] (helo=fnord.ir.bbn.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.34) id 1CUVT5-00016U-0e
	for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:27:51 -0500
Original-Received: by fnord.ir.bbn.com (Postfix, from userid 10853)
	id 97C502180; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:27:50 -0500 (EST)
Original-To: Bill Schottstaedt <bil@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <419B5A9E.6060408@ccrma>
Original-Lines: 6
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Guile related discussions <guile-user.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user>,
	<mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/guile-user>
List-Post: <mailto:guile-user@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user>,
	<mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:3726
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:3726

Thanks.  I wasn't aware of this.  It's not a guile-gtk replacement if
it wraps 2.0 rather than 1.2, though - although clearly 2.0 is more
useful to wrap.

-- 
        Greg Troxel <gdt@ir.bbn.com>


_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user