Re: Around again, and docs lead role

[Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net>]

>>>>> "Thamer" == Thamer Al-Harbash <tmh@whitefang.com> writes:

    Thamer> My two cents:

    Thamer> It's a two man job. We need one honest to goodness guile
    Thamer> developer who has spent a fair amount of time writing the guile
    Thamer> code (recently) actually write up a series of drafts, and one
    Thamer> person to edit and make sure the documentation is readable.

    Thamer> I'd be willing to do edit, review, and fill in the smaller
    Thamer> parts. I know enough texinfo to do this comfortably. I don't
    Thamer> think anyone but a developer should actually be writing the
    Thamer> documentation. guile is a fairly complicated piece of software.

Hi Thamer,

Thanks for this response.  It's slightly at cross purposes to what I
was intending, but I think that in itself highlights that we need a
better overall picture of the current docs state, and an overall plan
for how to finish them.

More from me later in the week, but please feel free to contribute
more of your own assessment and thoughts.

        Neil



_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel