From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Serving files with guile web server Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:09:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <9838.187.147.43.113.1300318403.squirrel@lavabit.com> <58164.187.147.43.113.1300373729.squirrel@lavabit.com> <874o6z97gg.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <8762rb5yho.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301584180 24106 80.91.229.12 (31 Mar 2011 15:09:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, Neil Jerram To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 31 17:09:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5JVA-000757-56 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:09:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41261 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5JV9-0003Vc-54 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:09:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52098 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5JUz-0003VX-41 for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:09:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5JUu-00044S-RQ for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:09:25 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:61754 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5JUu-00044L-8a for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:09:20 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCBE3260; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:11:09 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=TbFwxAFGh9ZzzKJEkMO7if0h4no=; b=mBvEcj L59re3qYFcC0Em19LsdXJp6IrBmSNvbGy0WIqcd5xkEQebbGG+8o+Wzl/c8tnOjv V9RGqRoSHstDeTVulrBligp1s90HwMVjKpy6CWsZckAjGUlio/ZBm991dK2/uzrw yYtckDi7YAN45DR6MMvJwgbyH5knpNazNvA98= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=lkN3oNsR6aEszEP2/UN7KiTeocSSCj5P z4sYGu7xEl53eT0SsGDGC7Cgf/OTPBpb12uZ1NiexSnMl0+U5yleMCQaQMxtsQFH cAHHJiWka7wesK1QWqDPeJH+jdZ4tni7LotL8bGTgp8hSnPCqrTv/VC1n2ZY1XlV xi16jH3h/FM= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC45F325F; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:11:05 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1323B325E; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:11:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:23:30 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 19993FD6-5BA9-11E0-910A-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8564 Archived-At: On Thu 31 Mar 2011 16:23, Andy Wingo writes: > On Tue 22 Mar 2011 09:51, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > >> If efficiency is a concern, another approach is to wrap >> sendfile(2) or something like it. > > IMHO we should bind sendfile(2) in Guile itself. Well, I guess I take that back: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/25012 But we'll still be here whenever gnulib figures out what it is they want to name it :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/