From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user,gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Ditching (debug-enable 'backwards) ? Date: 05 Nov 2002 23:13:59 +0000 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <8765veblg1.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87pttl8112.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036543053 24911 80.91.224.249 (6 Nov 2002 00:37:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 00:37:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Development , Guile Users Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 189ECK-0006TX-00 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2002 01:37:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 189E8F-0004uR-00; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 19:33:19 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 189DyB-0001ds-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 19:22:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 189Dy9-0001dS-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 19:22:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.21] helo=s1.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 189Dy8-0001dC-00; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 19:22:52 -0500 Original-Received: from laruns.ossau.uklinux.net (bts-0378.dialup.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.49.122]) by s1.uklinux.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA60MiD24110; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 00:22:45 GMT Original-Received: from laruns.ossau.uklinux.net.ossau.uklinux.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by laruns.ossau.uklinux.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.2 (i386)) with ESMTP id C9A42DC4D1; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 23:13:59 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: Marius Vollmer In-Reply-To: <87pttl8112.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> Original-Lines: 22 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:1336 gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1645 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:1336 >>>>> "Marius" == Marius Vollmer writes: >> I have no objection to frames appearing in reverse order, but I prefer >> that they were then _numbered_ like this (artist's impression): Marius> Yes, exactly my opinion as well. OK - thanks. Marius> GDB's convention sounds more useful to me. The innermost frame is Marius> more important than the outermost one and should get a simple index. Marius> With our convention, you have to know how many frames there are before Marius> being able to name the innermost one or any frame relative to it. Marius> Is it possible to fix this without creating a lot of confusion? I'll take a look. I don't think it's acceptable to reverse the meaning of `stack-ref', but it should be OK to change details of the debugger display; if the Emacs interface relies on these details, we can change it correspondingly. Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user