From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: PATCH: assume -s Date: 04 Sep 2003 00:17:28 +0100 Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20030828093229.F1440@netdot.net> <20030829092031.S1440@netdot.net> <87vfsak55h.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1062688661 31735 80.91.224.253 (4 Sep 2003 15:17:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 15:17:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 04 17:17:40 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19uvrf-0004cH-00 for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2003 17:17:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19uvo6-0000aB-Gq for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2003 11:13:58 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.22) id 19ugtD-0004rV-7Z for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2003 19:18:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.22) id 19ugsp-0004ig-0A for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2003 19:17:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.21] (helo=s1.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19ugso-0004h6-1N for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2003 19:17:50 -0400 Original-Received: from laruns.ossau.uklinux.net (bts-0509.dialup.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.49.253]) by s1.uklinux.net (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h83NHkX17400; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 00:17:46 +0100 Original-Received: from laruns.ossau.uklinux.net.ossau.uklinux.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by laruns.ossau.uklinux.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.2 (i386)) with ESMTP id 97510DC4D3; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 00:17:31 +0100 (BST) Original-To: Kevin Ryde In-Reply-To: <87vfsak55h.fsf@zip.com.au> Original-Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:2225 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:2225 >>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin Ryde writes: Kevin> Neil Jerram writes: >> >> Thanks. This was discussed in October 2002 on the list, and there >> seemed a pretty clear consensus in favour, so I'll apply this soon. Kevin> Does "guile -- foo.scm" do the same as "guile foo.scm"? No. Personally I think this is useful. Does it contravene some GNU standard though? (If the script uses getopt, though, I wonder if something like "guile foo.scm -s switch -- arg" works? I'd guess it does.) Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user