From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: 1.6.0 problems with libguilereadline-v-12 and fix Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:43:59 -0400 Organization: What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid? Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20020918203311.3C5FA3F28@fnord.ir.bbn.com> <87k7ljgfvd.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87znuegbw8.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1032389089 31769 127.0.0.1 (18 Sep 2002 22:44:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 22:44:49 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17rnYt-0008GG-00 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 00:44:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17rnZE-0004Pt-00; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:45:08 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17rnYF-0004CA-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:44:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17rnYD-0004Bl-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:44:06 -0400 Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu ([129.22.96.25] helo=multivac.cwru.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 17rnYC-0004Bh-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:44:04 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 7851 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2002 22:44:21 -0000 Original-To: Greg Troxel , guile-user@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87znuegbw8.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Wed, 18 Sep 2002 17:40:07 -0500") Mail-Copies-To: nobody Original-Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:1016 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:1016 Rob Browning wrote: > prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes: >> But how about this: when linking one of Guile's own libraries, >> temoporarily prepend (assq-ref %guile-build-info 'libdir) to >> LD_LIBRARY_PATH or LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH, whichever is searched first. >> Would that satisfy everyone? > > I believe the problem is that if we start modifying either > LD_LIBRARY_PATH or LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH (or the attendant libltdl > functions), we won't just affect guile, we'll affect any app linked > against libguile (if we perform the modification in libguile) or any > other library we load that also uses libltdl or dlopen. By "temporarily", I meant that the modification should be undone after linking the library. Would this problem still remain then? paul _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user