From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Binary packages of Guile development snapshots? Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:04:46 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87vd9gawv6.fsf@linux-lqcw.site> <87r5k3qcz5.fsf@linux-lqcw.site> <87aaqora1h.fsf@linux-lqcw.site> <87tyov1eua.fsf_-_@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277234368 26055 80.91.229.12 (22 Jun 2010 19:19:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, Rob Browning To: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 22 21:19:26 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR90F-0002Iy-Rr for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:19:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59684 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OR8qN-0003nO-13 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:09:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51483 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OR8qH-0003nI-2Q for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:09:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR8qF-0006cY-FP for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:09:05 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:42585 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR8qF-0006cP-Dd for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBBBBE41F; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:09:02 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=tD0Ax+EsBqkI kSmucst0X6ti0jA=; b=fkJ3KbKjNpseNput88WWMH7yUXYqPBjF4pC19+w5vQuj H7k2nSqlLX0qhXKGvnv/u0pGKDzuNKb+U59iy0d8Za7FkKMQWOgVKINOnrcnDg8T 24PhV036Yi0BEntpWPMWfT25plAASiSODbQaU2/bEXJq366T9nszdvww5vOdWwk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=XTBRyj uluoVrj66EQXO8gWUU2Mp7eBlSB7KP/uxvuM17yid+RwvD91IpEVY1Kkrh31ZfX9 lvoC2V8qIw3cYSWz8TS24ZjI+VGDyUScITcXNARwy18noinzChAQHYtEa2lWusiN WOa0vzvrjcKzoWH5ZCQh1KOEx2jnh3yFwBmus= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB20BE41E; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:08:59 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [83.32.68.226]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 068D5BE41D; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:08:54 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87tyov1eua.fsf_-_@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsWgdMSbcMOhbiBOxJtt?= =?utf-8?B?ZWMiJ3M=?= message of "Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:33:49 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9CA571A2-7E31-11DF-9AB4-9056EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:7925 Archived-At: On Tue 22 Jun 2010 13:33, =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n N=C4=9Bmec writes: > Does anybody know if there are any pre-built deb (or other "binary", > for that matter) packages of Guile development snapshots available? > Searching the net doesn't give much hope. I'd like to avoid building > Guile (tried it, wasn't a pleasant experience). Not that I am aware of. I have copied Rob, the Debian package maintainer; hopefully he or someone else in Debian will find time to do this. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/