From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Possible Memory Leak with stream-for-each Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:36:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87iq44yi1q.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280136849 14403 80.91.229.12 (26 Jul 2010 09:34:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-user@gnu.org To: Abhijeet More Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 26 11:34:05 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdK4S-00005D-JN for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:34:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42924 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OdK4R-0007KU-VK for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 05:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33543 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OdK4H-0007KN-FL for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 05:33:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdK48-0006PS-0F for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 05:33:53 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:64000 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdK47-0006PI-Uk; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 05:33:43 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4646BC867F; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 05:33:43 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=PPXNX/gPWnmMvp39BCwweeC5MAY=; b=eClpQI D57yr3G5xmT8ipqHSRuRnM6bX0pOliIsa3gc1PYKecUtB8MN1FhDHbqBSLadbvSU FvElWzBE4AtwKeJ55t2UtqbiabrCnPLgex97GRGbLP3xh7d942uKqtOhmNyuZz0i ct60e6PemUkUOHehCdbaqvuK7GI+EjgK7T9yw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=uJtd4qjKpSGezL/fq71VbF4NWsFyQZDD X1mrIXm31Ys04DwatPGXkJBYYt7RrEq3QEQzBwWPjKjse/lpPZtVKOkmn4POem9E RKMzrwgJSvfa/BeROF6eHkI1oh7e8nM+TiuwmLkwPfnM1jvHGneSFwxprHgATwH2 ukEZTXNEJLo= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2171EC867D; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 05:33:41 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [83.81.248.55]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9FA32C867B; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 05:33:38 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Abhijeet More's message of "Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:46:16 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E05D828C-9898-11DF-A4BC-9056EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8006 Archived-At: On Sat 24 Jul 2010 18:46, Abhijeet More writes: > The reason I feel strongly that this is not the problem is that the > same implementation (including cons-stream) does *not* cause a leak > with PLT Scheme/racket. I think it's probably our bug, but I haven't had time to examine it thoroughly. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/