From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter TB Brett Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: A question about scm_{to,from}_locale_string() Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 10:46:14 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87tybw1meh.fsf@gnu.org> <87wrgrv1p0.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1307872003 14678 80.91.229.12 (12 Jun 2011 09:46:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:46:43 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 12 11:46:39 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QVhFf-0000h1-BV for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:46:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48741 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QVhFe-000125-Hs for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 05:46:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43492) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QVhFR-000120-Mn for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 05:46:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QVhFQ-0004oM-KI for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 05:46:25 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:43429) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QVhFQ-0004oI-DR for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 05:46:24 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QVhFP-0000cM-70 for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:46:23 +0200 Original-Received: from 109.224.138.141 ([109.224.138.141]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:46:23 +0200 Original-Received: from peter by 109.224.138.141 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:46:23 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 35 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 109.224.138.141 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:/qo+L44DQWY1RIbP58YCR1ivdTc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8635 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > Probably sooner or later it behooves us (clients of libguile) > to hold a libguile "portability summit", where common bits of > autoconfigury, shimming, etc can be actively pooled, refactored > and (hopefully) incorporated into a time-saving tarball. > > In this way, stuff like the autoconf check you mention, and > stuff like Autogen's or Serveez's C shims can be centrally > maintained and not re-invented time and time again. That sounds to me like you volunteering to organise one. :-) I'd certainly be interesting taking part! Peter =2D-=20 Peter Brett Remote Sensing Research Group Surrey Space Centre --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk30iuYACgkQZ7Gbq7g7vpooDgCgnHATGXo0zZwVJI2BqXXVqwbm V/MAnjsiWl62kKsyxfq6v0+k71BNbdfZ =EJ5n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--