From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: 1.6.0 problems with libguilereadline-v-12 and fix Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 17:38:20 -0400 Organization: What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid? Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20020918203311.3C5FA3F28@fnord.ir.bbn.com> <87k7ljgfvd.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87ofaby1l8.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <8765wcwrkh.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1034113263 1046 127.0.0.1 (8 Oct 2002 21:41:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 21:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17z261-0000Fu-00 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 23:40:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17z24h-0003bt-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 17:39:31 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17z23b-0000lW-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 17:38:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17z23Z-0000gG-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 17:38:22 -0400 Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu ([129.22.96.25] helo=multivac.cwru.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 17z23Y-0000f4-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 17:38:21 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 8252 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2002 21:38:42 -0000 Original-To: Greg Troxel , guile-user@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <8765wcwrkh.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> (Marius Vollmer's message of "08 Oct 2002 23:26:06 +0200") Mail-Copies-To: nobody Mail-Followup-To: Greg Troxel , guile-user@gnu.org Original-Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:1169 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:1169 Marius Vollmer wrote: > I really do strongly believe that when you install software into > /usr/local but the system can't find shared libraries in > /usr/local/lib by default, then the system is not correctly > configured, not the package that has been installed into /usr/local. > Same with any other prefix. Ok, but my way of configuring the system to find those libraries is to use ld -R. If libltdl is fixed to look in such directories, then each admin gets to choose whether to use -R or LD_LIBRARY_PATH on their own systems, so everybody's happy. Right? I'm not asking for Guile to automatically supply -R${libdir}. I can add that to LDFLAGS myself, and those who don't like that way of doing things can leave it out. But I would like for -R${libdir} to be used by libltdl, if I supply it. paul _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user