From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Guile module for sqlite Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 13:06:21 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4BEF34E5.4050705@online.de> <1274147828.1966.0.camel@romel-compaq> <1274210778.2179.134.camel@romel-compaq> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274441912 27454 80.91.229.12 (21 May 2010 11:38:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 11:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tantalum , guile-user@gnu.org, Julian Kalbhenn To: "Romel R. Sandoval Palomo" Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 21 13:38:29 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFQYf-0005yQ-0C for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 13:38:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52378 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFQYe-0008CP-BB for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 07:38:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56104 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFQYZ-0008BB-P6 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 07:38:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFQYW-0001R1-9R for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 07:38:23 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:55232 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFQYW-0001Qv-7F for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 07:38:20 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0A4B5A50; Fri, 21 May 2010 07:38:20 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=7MOIdPI/ksa9+qoyabbIjQ8kY/k=; b=iE23m3 rC1GlSH/exKUSn4SUHTPCRnbYk5TuD5idQYw+WZBHLJMwLqjSMJbhhELS87R2w52 1rUyp0VGgJOvTNB0QDoPzBdv+mneAcf1azFUbj13Kqyvm05EGtP7UnMFqc8F6WCT Q3f64EHJs+ApPuoQsJS5LnQJ7XCPMAcFqbYzw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=FNglpt3BMsDZvLtbJ6BepGkDE5g8X0LJ KkV+cKEp58xb/udF3L6QYwPzlQU+zmLGnzWhCdu1CtONReBbceTAuY4fmms1KbHB LvD1cfnnvAb5of6g8k0nzW049vk0yLHsj/AXrV6iUY8CL8vpJUYqaGeMrIi/ccko ItMC5ItcqhA= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F5FB5A4E; Fri, 21 May 2010 07:38:15 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [81.39.169.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C59B2B5A47; Fri, 21 May 2010 07:38:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <1274210778.2179.134.camel@romel-compaq> (Romel R. Sandoval Palomo's message of "Tue, 18 May 2010 14:26:18 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5850A26A-64CD-11DF-B4E3-D033EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:7795 Archived-At: Hi, On Tue 18 May 2010 21:26, "Romel R. Sandoval Palomo" writes: > Perfect, now I have guile-dbi and guile-dbd-sqlite working on guile 2.0 > > Thanks to Linas Vepstas, tantalum, and Julian Kalbhenn. Yes, thanks, that's great! > The only issue was with LIBADD. I edited Makefiles to use -lguile-2.0 > instead of -lguile Linas would you mind looking into this? If you want to maintain back compatibility, use `guile-config link' or the GUILE_LIBS macro. Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/