From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Failing to build g-wrap for guile 1.9.10 Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:31:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1275349131.20213.11.camel@romel-compaq> <1275417850.3290.13.camel@romel-compaq> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275464364 30518 80.91.229.12 (2 Jun 2010 07:39:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 07:39:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Romel Sandoval Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 02 09:39:23 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJiXp-0004pM-8F for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:39:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46405 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OJiXo-0005A6-Pb for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 03:39:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41785 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OJiXj-00058M-AH for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 03:39:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJiXh-000741-OA for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 03:39:15 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:57298 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJiXh-00073x-MM for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 03:39:13 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83737B826C; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 03:39:13 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=gGHwmwcPoHR/ UKepJ8H3nxAXnCU=; b=Vnk6/5rXzDhfXwLMRrbKxlmaO0rwfVNGs0wuJFAgfub8 PwRnFKaSZjNssMk+thnSRcyR8/SC17m0EA3+S8asT6xC82uxhvN9KY/RzxIqAORm I5IJQoiQ46BpOuHE1tjlZaR49ihxXejCjPivRat1EFfN+kUyDfjPQMZ5kS0m9sQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=SpaE4Q S0pALMd1YcoVLN2IO/K0NVb9fCBVP6C0ioCmpnPhZrlW//CwirWxGKbDU/kiplqW w/vXq/iFfmhCvIXvtGKvKCN2OFK6nKzdHBbDdcuEec7baSrS2jzH19C6+sbLTx8b SjRISEUjAap74r8hRhwMzQ7VzYDAEzRh5wavs= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B91B826B; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 03:39:11 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [80.24.4.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B084BB826A; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 03:39:08 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <1275417850.3290.13.camel@romel-compaq> (Romel Sandoval's message of "Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:44:10 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EF5EF198-6E19-11DF-8FEC-6730EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:7820 Archived-At: On Tue 01 Jun 2010 20:44, Romel Sandoval writes: > checking for guile-1.9... no <-------------------------- LOOK AT THIS! > > Could that represent a problem? Hm, dunno. Perhaps it's looking for a binary with that name? It seems you're building fine though. > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > core-runtime.c: In function =E2=80=98gw_raise_error=E2=80=99: > core-runtime.c:55: error: ignoring return value of =E2=80=98vasprintf=E2= =80=99, declared > with attribute warn_unused_result Here it seems you need to have configured with --disable-Werror, unfortunately... Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/