From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: guile-gnome2 - Segmentation fault Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:58:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20100629183348.02da603c@rascar> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278010673 15709 80.91.229.12 (1 Jul 2010 18:57:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 18:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user To: David Pirotte Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 01 20:57:49 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUOxJ-0001YW-IH for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:57:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43827 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUOqs-0001FK-FU for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:51:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38867 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUOqb-000175-Qu for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:51:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUOqW-00007v-UG for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:50:53 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:56948 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUOqW-0008Vb-PN for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:50:48 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B2EC0F36; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:50:24 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=3AE+DIqoZWH/yajYGDB5VYrlySI=; b=pKxapq jb/Wkqn32uY+jP6E13EIgy7E6fzwGrbgwAbpRYK15sjCCt7VyQwSYGh1m9ZlsZ0J Nx0T8wcKf9OQ5xcXf3Wk0RWpYWdEnu8LCbj9mzUDNe8uFooSumn1WCFsP4ejSET5 sce3z/w/lFyIS0WT8l9Wx9IjwrkIsAmaUSR9s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=P8JX2Z8+HH2JMSe54E8p6truA2oOF294 c7lpZKZdVu9yWTIGqlOn5kDK482hn31SggstIVxmGPAjTf5H91Mbvs+b2zzWXbpP 6FpL5+Omz5dMXiXlr4dG+GKG/+acR6EX3fhqkPqAWWTAffDRXWccBDmBDjEWot/q fKzkhb6NQRk= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E489C0F35; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:50:23 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [86.164.245.70]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CEBD4C0F33; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:50:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20100629183348.02da603c@rascar> (David Pirotte's message of "Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:33:48 -0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 814A2C74-8541-11DF-A0AE-9056EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:7941 Archived-At: On Tue 29 Jun 2010 22:33, David Pirotte writes: > I'll try to produce a better backtrace [some .deb package have no -dbg corresponding package > and the -dev do not always include debugging symbols] > > But in order to help me helping developpers to get rid og this bug [which did not desappear with > the guile-gnome0 -> guile-gnome2 'porting' [in progress but some bits working already], I am > sending what i could come up with so far. Thanks for the report. Unfortunately the backtrace is not sufficient. Something is being freed with g_free which should be freed via a specific deallocator. Can you check to see that the following patches are applied to the debian package: 0ca1de9d89ed7b2899e49f273f27f810540a6508 3d11c93b290992b2c4d9eeef57c2a7a54f808783 Thanks, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/