From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Simplified slot access in goops Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:56:29 -0700 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283043224 9040 80.91.229.12 (29 Aug 2010 00:53:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 00:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, Maciek Godek To: Panicz Maciej Godek Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 29 02:53:42 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpW9S-0006GS-IH for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:53:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59011 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OpW9L-0005vs-CO for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:53:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47226 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OpW9A-0005vh-Td for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:53:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpW99-0005pN-Eb for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:53:20 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:54456 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpW99-0005pF-Aj for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:53:19 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A13D0124; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:53:18 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Dhp3ErZA8cjCAO3XnGHti9k87HU=; b=klJNpR b6239XAdp9mZt0v1tAFiVXOD6XpMHP42jFf4pxBKjXHo+uLae1HVt6YU9Jlolwx4 TuGl/VNI6N5MiqbxkVcokwp4/eW40XcBOMDUPobyJO3zPOvcyymwY6+SZxxp1k+3 3ZbNnQ13+Ink6XUvzkzXEwwSZ7ztd/WRIm40Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=JDLymDy/9soSfAuJ8eny+W9E9FJq7Pyb 5KGGfCkc+QBvTBTJ/A9j68VVL1xIUc5/+9vqwft/3QN4nN2NxwGAIN4mN2Cm36Tq qhaZdORLirZDYYpE9IrSgQ0+bA+6q/289BYO+sDXlRxkjvifN4Ga/almwXEZLOxD hP+gNj2DbYY= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C86D0122; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:53:16 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [76.166.198.241]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B058D0121; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:53:13 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Panicz Maciej Godek's message of "Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:22:53 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CEE9C6C6-B307-11DF-8232-030CEE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8115 Archived-At: On Sat 28 Aug 2010 17:22, Panicz Maciej Godek writes: > If it comes to the performance issues, I've been wondering, > what is the current state of guile-vm? Merged into Guile :-) Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/