From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: srfi-34 and raise Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 23:04:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87d3w3nb0z.fsf@gnu.org> <87y6erkveq.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275946134 13800 80.91.229.12 (7 Jun 2010 21:28:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 21:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 07 23:28:53 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLjsE-0003XM-Qn for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 23:28:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59274 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OLjsE-0006R3-8D for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:28:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55381 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OLjs7-0006PW-7e for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:28:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLjs4-0003kB-QR for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:28:38 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:46526 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLjs4-0003Rj-Oo; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:28:36 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2FD8BA406; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:26:01 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=kRkBcLVdg1Ab GiULUxY0oveWeaU=; b=Qdp8fBEDfCHkureJdpgyzGVItm5yl0T62FRJystucJSx Cxo6uvq67RLmm8wrcqwNp5Bn7f8liMAXTT6p932UlMmaylw26SRc1TcXSrNUwViW Q8E8WQ/GP7S57VbadQB71wr3WfJn7BiG/SfGQWdKfOh/YHpN/KEZ73jQIZgsJ28= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=WV1R6J +G8FFpOTRY8LY9YMkwYQlpQ2BCxnUDoHjloNYaLok8KOp+ROEGydtrRPVekH0Fld vTv6zl9ju4p7iFeEFXhmyW3UL5jl/OEHb3CjhAat41Qc6yZO72L98FEtRqL1Z0kd zBPNSUZk1zRv+RtXUIl3xOdWwdSpn9Ku/k2xk= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24AABA405; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:25:59 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [83.44.188.237]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6600BA404; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:25:56 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87y6erkveq.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:07:57 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 444CB658-727B-11DF-B5C1-6730EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:7836 Archived-At: On Mon 07 Jun 2010 12:07, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Julian Graham writes: > >>>> There are also many bindings that could be #:replaced in the rnrs >>>> modules. >>> >>> Yes, we should fix that. Perhaps Julian would be willing to do that? :-) >> >> Sure, although the solution that springs to my mind first is to make >> all bindings introduced by R6RS libraries #:replace-ing, via the >> `import' transformer. Objections? > > Can you give an example of what you mean? Yes I think I would want an example as well. I guess I would prefer that only exports to bindings in (guile) would be #:replaced (but that decision made programatically). A --=20 http://wingolog.org/