unofficial mirror of guile-user@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
To: Marek Kubica <marek@xivilization.net>
Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Modules
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 18:04:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3lj234p69.fsf@unquote.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110129131315.506f1e8c@halmanfloyd> (Marek Kubica's message of "Sat, 29 Jan 2011 13:13:15 +0100")

Hi Marek,

On Sat 29 Jan 2011 13:13, Marek Kubica <marek@xivilization.net> writes:

> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:26:07 +0100
> Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>> We don't add the current directory to the search path because it is a
>> security issue, for the same reason that "." is not in $PATH.
>
> What about "the same directory that the file is in"? The point is, when
> writing scripts that become larger than one file, splitting them into
> modules becomes immensely painful because the modules cannot find each
> other.

For what purpose?  If you are using modules, they are already in one
global namespace, the various roots of which are in the %load-path
and/or %load-compiled-path.  (resolve-module '(foo bar)) should work
regardless of what file calls it.

Perhaps you are interested in `load', which is problematic regarding
compiled files; for example when loading from a compiled file, how will
`load' know what is the current directory?  Note that .go files are
installed to e.g. /usr/lib64/guile, while source is in /usr/share/guile.

My suggestion is to use modules by name, or, equivalently, to use
`load-from-path'.  There might be a "proper" solution here, but I
haven't found it yet.

See also the bug at http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30480.

Regards,

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-01-29 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-08 11:45 Modules Marek Kubica
2010-12-08 18:11 ` Modules Andreas Rottmann
2010-12-09  1:19 ` Modules Nala Ginrut
2011-01-28 16:26 ` Modules Andy Wingo
2011-01-29 12:13   ` Modules Marek Kubica
2011-01-29 13:08     ` Modules Neil Jerram
2011-01-29 13:18       ` Modules Neil Jerram
2011-01-29 17:04     ` Andy Wingo [this message]
2011-01-29 18:37       ` Modules Marek Kubica
2011-01-29 23:17       ` Modules Neil Jerram
2011-01-30 10:13         ` Modules Thien-Thi Nguyen
2011-01-30 11:42         ` Modules Andy Wingo
2011-02-13 19:05           ` Modules Andy Wingo
2011-01-29 17:07     ` Modules Andy Wingo
2011-01-29 18:40       ` Modules Marek Kubica
2011-01-29 23:35       ` Modules Neil Jerram
2011-02-01 21:43         ` Modules Andy Wingo
2011-02-02 14:43         ` Modules Jon Wilson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-21  5:40 modules Ian Zimmerman
2004-03-21 14:47 ` modules Andreas Rottmann
2004-03-22 18:05   ` modules Ian Zimmerman
2004-03-23 16:05     ` modules Robert Uhl
2004-03-21 21:29 ` modules Thien-Thi Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3lj234p69.fsf@unquote.localdomain \
    --to=wingo@pobox.com \
    --cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
    --cc=marek@xivilization.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).