From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter TB Brett Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Help needed debugging segfault with Guile 1.8.7 Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 07:52:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <871v6sqbny.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <8739ql38pe.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87r5e1r4gb.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291362753 25328 80.91.229.12 (3 Dec 2010 07:52:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 07:52:33 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 03 08:52:29 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1POQRP-0005J1-Ki for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:52:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49134 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1POQRP-0003i8-7A for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:52:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55693 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1POQRK-0003i1-Px for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:52:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1POQRJ-0005Dt-L8 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:52:22 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:57344) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1POQRJ-0005Di-Fj for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:52:21 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1POQRH-0005Fo-SG for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:52:19 +0100 Original-Received: from 109.170.137.199 ([109.170.137.199]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:52:19 +0100 Original-Received: from peter by 109.170.137.199 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:52:19 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 42 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 109.170.137.199 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:FvA69+sFOkMZiVDJeJ60PZBfayo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8284 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Peter TB Brett writes: > >> Thanks for the info. Judging by previous experience, gEDA will need to >> support Guile 1.8.x for at least two years after Guile 2.x arrives. >> It's probably going to be painful. :-/ > > Out of curiosity, did you try building/running gEDA with Guile 1.9.x, > the pre-releases of 2.x? > > If not, we=E2=80=99d be glad if you could test it and report back on any > difficulties you may encounter. The 1.9 tarballs are available from > alpha.gnu.org. The =E2=80=98NEWS=E2=80=99 file documents some incompatib= ility issues. > I'll try and make time to give it a go today. Is it also at all useful to try a build against Guile's git master? Peter =2D-=20 Peter Brett Remote Sensing Research Group Surrey Space Centre --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkz4odMACgkQZ7Gbq7g7vpqJ3ACfdU40glodSf1XHDPl/ivKaT8Q LTAAoIHfNEJiiGjVsS5lGIWxF1rYEO8J =ZtXU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--