From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: hash table handles Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 12:15:51 -0500 Organization: What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid? Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036516713 723 80.91.224.249 (5 Nov 2002 17:18:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 17:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1897LQ-0000BL-00 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 18:18:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1897Jw-00030S-00; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 12:16:56 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 1897Iw-0002iT-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 12:15:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 1897Iu-0002hz-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 12:15:54 -0500 Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu ([129.22.96.25] helo=multivac.cwru.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 1897It-0002hi-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 12:15:52 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 23768 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2002 17:16:13 -0000 Original-To: guile-user@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Mon, 04 Nov 2002 17:49:12 -0800") Mail-Copies-To: nobody Mail-Followup-To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:1332 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:1332 Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote: > using cdr to access the associated data should be fine. I had no doubt of that. My doubt is about set-cdr!. > i see this: > > By convention, a handle in a hash table is the pair which associates a > key with a value. I don't see that in the 1.6.0 manual, so I'll assume it was added later. Assuming the following is in fact true, I would also like to see something to the effect of: Changes to the cdr of a handle (e.g., via set-cdr!) will be reflected in future lookups for the same key. Changes to the car of a handle (e.g., via set-car!) may cause future lookups to fail. paul _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user