From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.gtk,gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: guile-gnome-0 - guile-1.6.8-6.3 - random crash Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:33:50 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20100317170918.0a21c8be@rascar> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269290912 21314 80.91.229.12 (22 Mar 2010 20:48:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user , guile-gtk To: David Pirotte Original-X-From: guile-gtk-general-bounces+glgg-guile-gtk-general=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 22 21:48:28 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: glgg-guile-gtk-general@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NtoXt-0002fl-Q9 for glgg-guile-gtk-general@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:48:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59583 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NtoXt-0000ny-A5 for glgg-guile-gtk-general@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:48:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NtoXq-0000nd-JQ for guile-gtk-general@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:48:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38149 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NtoXp-0000nT-AK for guile-gtk-general@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:48:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NtoXn-0000ej-V1 for guile-gtk-general@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:48:17 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:65154 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NtoXn-0000ec-Ro; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:48:15 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDC1A43E8; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:48:15 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Nd5UdbHUoAa6Ayv3rm0cDdfAR8c=; b=mlO+2Q D+chrT1A5aOYuzAk/szZpck5C//yBoNSRuHeI1WVJYiGfWg75s8ESF5rI86EDqzc fs4Y/dvzCmnBwf5ZUU/Om+Q9JMA82TOAjzHuwttRSlpfX78tPiHcL2FYMcYq+qhL osjvP6xQFo0yHKuOHJiWdewD0oIv88hGx26ZM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=aFR/iwd+gQpa07xJdzo80krND3QHbCHD vJrKaTjFTmeDsoOR6obvmdaMLgPujX9X5JkQukN4m/O0v/z/vqA+VeXc+3mcIiNQ wojx6mYqiHzfm6SkUux0eghGLwPQxaELCbwYnVH8BKLrxuq5nH/gTkrLVjmRKWsq I96k6izLgs4= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08412A43D9; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:48:13 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [88.17.131.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45BA8A43D7; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:48:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20100317170918.0a21c8be@rascar> (David Pirotte's message of "Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:09:18 -0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3B7241B0-35F4-11DF-8812-D033EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-gtk-general@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussions about guile-gtk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-gtk-general-bounces+glgg-guile-gtk-general=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-gtk-general-bounces+glgg-guile-gtk-general=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.gtk:879 gmane.lisp.guile.user:7709 Archived-At: On Wed 17 Mar 2010 21:09, David Pirotte writes: > I know, guile-gnome-0 is obsolate ... But I have no choice right know and really really hope that > I can help developers to find out what the problem is and debug it ... As long as you know this :) This was released *five years ago* :) Are you using custom tree models? I bet it's something whereby we are freeing something with g_free but it was allocated with g_slice_alloc. What about this fix (from git revision c7101904f2704b3cf7fbde5c02602be01ff37f2b, 2007-12-09), to gtk/gw/gtk-support.c: @@ -727,7 +761,7 @@ _wrap_gtk_tree_model_iter_next (GtkTreeModel *model, GtkTreeIter *iter) if (gtk_tree_model_iter_next (model, new)) return new; - g_free (new); + gtk_tree_iter_free (new); return NULL; } Regards, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/