From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Is there any approach to define "private" vars in GOOPS? Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 23:19:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1299638259.2577.5.camel@Renee-desktop> <87d3m0llza.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <1299662845.2577.82.camel@Renee-desktop> <1299663423.2577.86.camel@Renee-desktop> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299709220 14344 80.91.229.12 (9 Mar 2011 22:20:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 22:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile , Neil Jerram To: NalaGinrut@gmail.com Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 09 23:20:15 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PxRjr-0006LQ-Cw for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 23:20:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46492 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxRjq-0004Kn-O8 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:20:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44044 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxRja-0004KA-24 for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:19:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxRjY-0004E4-QZ for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:19:57 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:58112 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxRjY-0004Dw-Mj for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:19:56 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E024C11; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 17:21:24 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=NLv5aF6g/uIVhTLNMW5ffab5wtw=; b=Pjl2vi YxQDXiEHMkaIHwUmXMyG0DzDCsjOjNtqs2HOZcMglwO96MdZIbdBhuZ/adaqIFSV zYQOIw+eRMXZLV8Evvf4P3c9r03zz2+llWj3HXQ1I48stAy4gpw/tg8bdxnWNAm9 IpKhTz6bi0GV2QwHJCI+pMQYVGQtolncOji1g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=r3JutTbt052+GmB4hK4T7GwS8JBlH7rK 4+gtTrZN/AM/Eo9dhSk+5C1Y0U4RBw42W3Jd1lkp8bNf6NU+YR2h4/15eBRT6Ifv p9+elig5/ZU8/zh5MIiiykoAbU4W+EsmLCXdef4xs6NvrM/O3Z6H47Z1DGIqP6ph trHMyt2EbvU= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0389C4C10; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 17:21:20 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29CAF4C0F; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 17:21:17 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1299663423.2577.86.camel@Renee-desktop> (nalaginrut@gmail.com's message of "Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:37:03 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8F84AC68-4A9B-11E0-A95E-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8509 Archived-At: On Wed 09 Mar 2011 10:37, nalaginrut writes: > But I still want to talk this topic: "How to hide the critical > property?" I don't know what the GOOPS / CLOS answer is to this, but more generally, you might enjoy the following paper: http://mumble.net/~jar/pubs/secureos/ Regards, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/