From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: hash table handles Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 18:56:21 -0500 Organization: What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid? Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036456374 31571 80.91.224.249 (5 Nov 2002 00:32:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 00:32:54 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 188reG-0008D2-00 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 01:32:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 188rS7-0005QP-00; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 19:20:19 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 188r51-0004jf-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 18:56:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 188r4z-0004jS-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 18:56:26 -0500 Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu ([129.22.96.25] helo=multivac.cwru.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 188r4y-0004jJ-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 18:56:24 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 20388 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2002 23:56:43 -0000 Original-To: guile-user@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (prj@po.cwru.edu's message of "Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:17:23 -0500") Mail-Copies-To: nobody Mail-Followup-To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:1329 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:1329 I wrote: > If I have a pair returned by hash*-get-handle or hash*-create-handle, > can I use set-cdr! on it and expect to see the change reflected in > future lookups of the same key? To clarify: I can see by experimentation that the code does behave this way. But the documentation doesn't make it entirely clear whether this is by design, or an accident, and thus whether it might change in the future. paul _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user