From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Interpreter Sessions (Newbie) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:56:36 -0500 Organization: What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid? Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200302221253.28371.clinton@unknownlamer.org> <200302241650.24519.clinton@unknownlamer.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1046455550 11867 80.91.224.249 (28 Feb 2003 18:05:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:05:50 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18oosX-000318-00 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:05:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18oosE-000770-03 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:04:42 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18oorK-0006tJ-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:03:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18oor8-0006qf-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:03:37 -0500 Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu ([129.22.96.25] helo=multivac.cwru.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18ookq-00055t-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:57:04 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 8264 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2003 17:56:59 -0000 Original-To: In-Reply-To: <200302241650.24519.clinton@unknownlamer.org> (Clinton Ebadi's message of "Mon, 24 Feb 2003 16:50:24 -0500") Mail-Copies-To: nobody Mail-Followup-To: Original-Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:1695 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:1695 Clinton Ebadi wrote: > On Monday 24 February 2003 11:39, Paul Jarc wrote: >> Clinton Ebadi wrote: >>> ;;; (make-module size uses-list) >>> (define userid-module (make-module 1021 (list (resolve-module >>> '(guile-user))))) >> >> Hm... I've been using resolve-interface here, not resolve-module. >> Does it make a difference? > > They do different things: I know that. What I'm not sure of is which one should be used with make-module. resolve-interface was suggested by Marius Vollmer: But I wonder if resolve-module would work equally well. I suspect that when the #:select and #:renamer areguments are not given, resolve-interface is equivalent to resolve-module. paul _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user