From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Making the -e option compatible with new versions of Guile 1.4 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 20:43:36 +0100 Message-ID: References: <41E8581C.4050408@ossau.uklinux.net> <41EC12E3.4030605@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1105991074 23565 80.91.229.6 (17 Jan 2005 19:44:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:44:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 17 20:44:26 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cqcna-0006Sd-00 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 20:44:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CqczR-0007yy-UB for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:56:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cqcz2-0007si-MK for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:56:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cqcz0-0007r9-9J for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:56:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cqcz0-0007r5-5k for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:56:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [129.217.163.1] (helo=mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cqcmo-0004FM-66 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:43:38 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951AB4DB97; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 20:43:37 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (krusty [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10763-04-2; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 20:43:37 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from troy.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (troy.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.17]) by mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1025D4BA0F; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 20:43:37 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by troy.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 520) id C9C4DB995; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 20:43:36 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Neil Jerram In-Reply-To: <41EC12E3.4030605@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:32:51 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:4099 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:4099 Neil Jerram writes: > > Hmm, yes, in a debugger, your syntax could refer to all procedures > > ever created. > > Hmm - not sure what you mean here by "all procedures". I meant, it could refer to the (define ...) form as a point in a program. Whenever that form is executed, the debugger might instrument the created function so that the right thing happens (like stopping on call when it is a breakpoint). _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user