From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Some introductory docs about C level threading Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:08:45 +0100 Message-ID: References: <6b496d191d7216e82df4e9a7afbb3168@raeburn.org> <87fz0falxl.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107950920 2468 80.91.229.2 (9 Feb 2005 12:08:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:08:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, Ken Raeburn Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 09 13:08:36 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cyqdx-0008Qf-T9 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:08:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyqsT-0002jw-GP for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 07:23:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cyqru-0002iQ-Po for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 07:22:54 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cyqrq-0002gW-V9 for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 07:22:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cyqrq-0002gD-Te for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 07:22:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [129.217.163.1] (helo=mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CyqeF-0003gU-A3 for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 07:08:47 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF13F44234; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:08:46 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (krusty [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13322-03; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:08:45 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from troy.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (troy.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.17]) by mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F78144233; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:08:45 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by troy.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 520) id 429F1B962; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:08:45 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Kevin Ryde In-Reply-To: <87fz0falxl.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Wed, 02 Feb 2005 10:40:38 +1100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: guile-user@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:4225 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:4225 Kevin Ryde writes: > You can force load/stores to be exactly as given using `volatile', [...] How would that work exactly? Can we flag each assignment operation as volatile, or would the SCM type need to be made volatile? Would this be a reason to remove SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_LOC, for example, and to disallow pointers to SCM in general (since we must control all assignments)? _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user