From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Zelphir Kaltstahl Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: guile-hall issues converting my project to a hall project Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:12:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: <11206998.46ALo4VoAQ@terra> <02902ff9-1585-a453-4e36-c9a731eee6fe@posteo.de> <6330005.mNMjihpRT5@terra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22446"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Tim Van den Langenbergh Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 16 19:12:40 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lC4q0-0005jJ-0j for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:12:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36216 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC4pz-00059I-2e for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 13:12:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58572) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC4pa-00050N-61 for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 13:12:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:52655) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC4pU-0005gS-BB for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 13:12:13 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D96B816005F for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:12:05 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1613499125; bh=06LKx0p0FHo4250kPic8qxt0cgHk3yYLcM8KbWS90/U=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:From; b=cbrjr5rXlDnfms9hx0vlYdiZZJrU+56nWAm2+wZp9qf+esXSZtzB1dAl+f4yebgdj XLVdDqt0hKk+EuK/gcYUQ/rMvQ720b23UVGqQL0YFg00RRfd2bp+K/dgdud+2VpzmH aRrvbwU0LzpIGuiA2wFi8XXoGMjr6Uyweyxzo0gD4Iyl8BeE54+4sDjHesOkBvmi3A M9wAp9nGDwtxR8apfSjHLfB58l11acGm79JeR7QwtTgUjk8yZuoRH5ceTG2Eoq+3a/ g6yke2MBnDCOVog5Ctb3ovMywlYKHpFB5lEYqiO9M4fUyH42VniuZ70S1q3NZn5cG5 p0qy2hbCLqOIw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Dg8FK0hFLz9rxP; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:12:04 +0100 (CET) X-Tagtoolbar-Keys: D20210216191204352 In-Reply-To: <6330005.mNMjihpRT5@terra> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=zelphirkaltstahl@posteo.de; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:17258 Archived-At: Hello Tim! Thank you, it works now! Removing the duplicate entry of `fslib` in hall.scm fixed it. Regarding the license: OK, I have no problem moving my license to `COPYING`. However, I still think, that it should not put GPL there, when I specified AGPL in `hall.scm`. This looks like a hardcoded fallback, which does not take the license specification into account. Something like: "If there is no `COPYING` file just put GPL into a file `COPYING`." instead of "If there is no `COPYING` file just put into a file `COPYING`.". I could be wrong though, as I do not know anything about guile-hall's internals. Follow up question would be, how to bring the package into the guix repository, but I am guessing, that it will be answered at https://guix.gnu.org/cookbook/en/html_node/Direct-checkout-hacking.html, which I have not read yet. Another question is, whether I should put you into the authors file and write something like "help with packaging" there. What is the common practice? Best regards, Zelphir On 2/16/21 5:48 PM, Tim Van den Langenbergh wrote: > Err, looking at your hall.scm file, you have the fslib file added to your > libraries twice. > > Guix environment is not needed if you have all the requirements for building > the package installed locally, but if you want to distribute your package it's > good practise to ensure it builds in a clean environment (see also https:// > guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Invoking-guix-environment.html for more > information about Guix environments). > > The "COPYING" file is hardcoded as license file in Hall, to ensure compatibility > with GNU standards: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.en.html > > Hope this helps, > > Vale > > -Tim > > -- repositories: https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl