From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Amirouche Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:23:39 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87lgtajpkc.fsf@web.de> <87vasdaeha.fsf@web.de> <8760kc5ucw.fsf@web.de> <3a0a18c5-0110-8e19-33fc-4be07c53b36b@hypermove.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489177512 6318 195.159.176.226 (10 Mar 2017 20:25:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 20:25:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 Cc: "guile-user@gnu.org" To: Arne Babenhauserheide , Panicz Maciej Godek Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 10 21:25:06 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmR5y-0000ec-Ue for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:25:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40860 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmR65-0004ed-3L for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:25:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51460) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmR5k-0004dD-3q for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:24:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmR5g-0007c7-U3 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:24:48 -0500 Original-Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:57585) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmR5g-0007bu-Nb for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:24:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mfilter2-d.gandi.net (mfilter2-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.140]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFC0172098; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:24:42 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter2-d.gandi.net Original-Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.196]) by mfilter2-d.gandi.net (mfilter2-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 97JJ_lbwKltz; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:23:28 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 82.239.61.147 Original-Received: from [192.168.0.7] (aul93-4-82-239-61-147.fbx.proxad.net [82.239.61.147]) (Authenticated sender: amirouche@hypermove.net) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4718C1720A4; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:23:27 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <3a0a18c5-0110-8e19-33fc-4be07c53b36b@hypermove.net> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 217.70.183.196 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:13486 Archived-At: Le 01/03/2017 à 20:21, Amirouche a écrit : > > > Le 14/02/2017 à 22:35, Arne Babenhauserheide a écrit : >> Panicz Maciej Godek writes: >>> There's surely many ways to approach that issue. The point is that for >>> some reason, Schemers from various tribes prefer to reinvent the >>> wheel, rather than use an existing one. (Not that I am any different) >>> However, I also think that these CPAN-alike solutions are far from >>> optimal: ideally, programming could be made an experience similar the >>> game "The Journey" by thatgamecompany (where you travel to your goal >>> and sometimes encounter other players heading the same direction), and >>> the repository itself could look more like Wikipedia (but first we'd >>> need to start perceiveing programming as a compact way of representing >>> knowledge) >> That sounds somehow like stackoverflow. We might already be going >> there :) > > That's a very good idea! There is trusting issue tho. Do you trust all what is written in wikipedia right? You can not simply execute code from the programming cloud like that. I try to review at least once the code I use. But I trust most of it to be safe.