From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: divoplade Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Calling back scheme from C Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:36:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <3a0ccd31a195f1544038b4ccc5ff1d15667a8e0d.camel@divoplade.fr> <20200922105026.5783d9ab0dd3641391cdd8c9@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34862"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 To: Chris Vine , guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 22 12:48:33 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kKfqb-0008yA-L8 for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:48:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36596 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKfqa-00074P-Jy for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 06:48:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKfeq-00027u-16 for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 06:36:24 -0400 Original-Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:39149) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKfen-0006ym-KY for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 06:36:23 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 86.194.83.229 Original-Received: from divoplade.home (lfbn-lyo-1-1007-229.w86-194.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.194.83.229]) (Authenticated sender: d@divoplade.fr) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23463240008; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:36:15 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <20200922105026.5783d9ab0dd3641391cdd8c9@gmail.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.193; envelope-from=d@divoplade.fr; helo=relay1-d.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/22 06:36:16 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:16947 Archived-At: Hello, Le mardi 22 septembre 2020 à 10:50 +0100, Chris Vine a écrit : > This may not be your issue. I offer it as something I had to deal > with > in code of my own to prevent incorrect collection for closures of > callbacks executed by a C event loop. It does not seem to fix it on my side. Could you share your callback closure example? divoplade