From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Abou Samra Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: UTF16 encoding adds BOM everywhere? Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 23:45:23 +0200 Message-ID: References: <63f03f91-58d8-c247-2d2a-78848c2e5ca9@abou-samra.fr> <87pmhz347r.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18431"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 20 23:45:59 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oEHW3-0004ZN-9N for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 23:45:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42144 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oEHW1-00029V-Q8 for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:45:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oEHVZ-00029M-JK for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:45:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.74]:51415) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oEHVX-0002aM-7I for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:45:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.128] ([82.65.251.18]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue109 [212.227.15.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mk0FS-1nlnNE3N5k-00kOih; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 23:45:24 +0200 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87pmhz347r.fsf@netris.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Xk7qz/tIa2fBVVVKxOp1lPCb5in9X3C56ZUNhtU8Bl9MTDl/rxu RDIO3NA4nJUwPUUZQ8aqBS/Q2m2RHfrJ3uD/b2wnJJP6ggIeUYDwfXVhXVT4MLEmj4soq7o UPFcjQXAk/XALujazKrt4hxY5lm3oweoWzRzJ4NsUam1LBxsGXeGl6FYtXKqZ1A9rtiwViB H9lxn58cDFnk5XtuMG4ng== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:LawjI7HwDho=:tuopd3tfqQk7zeULNHuXde 5vsjKjv4gpvaSeeffS0aQbevSvPDORv624JkQ2Rogfl7IJNx9sk85ryVXHI88Qf7peH9meq9+ 2XlWJ+pTwmCQheftHn70MunutZpMnfb6tDQJBVHdOU5fexy8x391fx9W8/YQymY24S+h1lV9q rJNQ9FdCejt/Lx8nvTO7BKSPMbY7o6rZkSnyOle2vrnUz4YhA80LxM5CroiHfWSbJqVZ+JPJE Ib5HkE5ZRX0tvHWQPZ/WbRRoyNFnkXVi7KCSBN4nJuWe6GZznuEbemd694nRuTpimtbNPgxGp SmsKqktgDodgAXDgQI8TEa2p1qgKgbSXK9zrHHoMWv+gP1yCaEokJw0w2BswXzV6Mzbcx+4uV +9040+iLXafJCZ0WlPyTXdP/XBVP+/yM8e0Gncf1W37G7GOS7hhXNkqcU6YYVreMBxTA4QGx5 SZcY8rxQZTd6pLnr2WkIWdSpYatT9gKGwlkGN7KMYnVbRkhCMuUzcdt/3DWMeZuVJVhSoJ6Ak hE4TlNMokKLJHrUmy24aBoqvylCY0jYehiKg6qiJAL2v4Q/9fB4nIJjIggum8kkxavWkDL6eU 0xPdJeydUhGyyA87HMVbyX4FZPiXaV5o5BUdyj65dIkOFve8paKfMFsyNgS8RcCboMIjU/Iis Qaa8FUeIfIEy9JiozP5X4TAvRG+SrTCkgMfotBSacxKD3IqbNLzBqPoJSg6A/X7V+ZEvd76Wh ZroTtJC3A8E0jJwTrDz9jqh+/xwNQz6Van6Elg== Received-SPF: none client-ip=217.72.192.74; envelope-from=jean@abou-samra.fr; helo=mout.kundenserver.de X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:18439 Archived-At: Hi Mark, Thanks for your reply! Le 20/07/2022 à 22:42, Mark H Weaver a écrit : > Hi, > > No, this is certainly a bug. It sounds like the > 'at_stream_start_for_bom_write' port flag is not being cleared, as it > should be, after the first character is written. I suspect that it > worked correctly when I first implemented proper BOM handling in 2013 > (commit cdd3d6c9f423d5b95f05193fe3c27d50b56957e9), but the ports code > has seen some major reworking since then. I guess that BOM handling was > broken somewhere along the way. > > I would suggest filing a bug report. OK, opened https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=56675 > I don't have time to look into it, sorry. I don't work on Guile anymore. A pity :-) Cheers, Jean