From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jacob Hrbek Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Can guile be implementation independent? Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 03:01:04 +0000 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Jacob Hrbek Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="------1b5d6edfc0301c8e9f01e8de79edc095b52e51abb89fcc6b450f8a2dbe15bc4e"; charset=utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38630"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Guile User To: Nala Ginrut Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 17 04:02:03 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1my3VT-0009p5-13 for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 04:02:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49978 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1my3VR-0001TD-Sn for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 22:02:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40582) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1my3Ur-0001T2-CR for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 22:01:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-4323.proton.ch ([185.70.43.23]:22528) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1my3Un-0002SY-Sy for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2021 22:01:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rixotstudio.cz; s=protonmail2; t=1639710078; bh=p2nv6CWzdOLNC4+YQqEF4z8pPjsfVdS2KaqpR3WdLfo=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:From:To:Cc; b=FcdWKEFGgZTuzi518ZfUj4eHz4v1bJdAMdkKq9+q9Nw+8xrHLwfCmpyMw8M3V5yev frqTkH3YdYA4ntPbmxjV3omUFMbR1G9DsXV7NeAlADfnkyvQF7r2simMPr3gVOqNc2 zcN2/JQr6ReM80TVIylPDTA1Sjl5rh1dvXCjGxJIDOgLisjrzw4PBFmJBExiVBAQFf WaT7OvOB9qso7s6ZKAjR7fI6HQ3hcuHPG2XYBoSgcz9NzEN5ts1EppZ3xGkbk8tSev 7HnKIMOl+MAVrbBfRWAgcdfi6SduP1Afjylh+OuvHUf8XMiEkrJrGxFWqJQEHEA04L nJ2icmjP7XWiw== In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.23; envelope-from=kreyren@rixotstudio.cz; helo=mail-4323.proton.ch X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:17862 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------1b5d6edfc0301c8e9f01e8de79edc095b52e51abb89fcc6b450f8a2dbe15bc4e Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=1eb42f16704d65615447e96f0b6a3d522dffd1fd5071fbd2584c5f88ec31 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 04:01:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2 Subject: Re: Can guile be implementation independent? Content-Language: en-US To: Nala Ginrut Cc: Guile User References: From: Jacob Hrbek In-Reply-To: --1eb42f16704d65615447e96f0b6a3d522dffd1fd5071fbd2584c5f88ec31 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Looks interesting, are there any known limitations in relation to Guile? On 12/17/21 03:53, Nala Ginrut wrote: > Hi Jacob! > You may take a look at akku.scm > You can write r7rs code and use Guile as one of the compiler alternatives. > > Best regards. > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021, 09:43 Jacob Hrbek wrote: > > I am used to working with common lisp where i can write code that is > "implementation independent" meaning that following a specific coding > style makes it compatible across multiple interpretators/compilers > (sbcl, LispWorks, etc..) > > Is there a way to do the same on GNU Guile? Like writing a code > that can > be interpreted by implementations that are following the IEEE > 1178-2008 > or R7RS standard? > > -- Jacob Hrbek > -- -- Jacob Hrbek --1eb42f16704d65615447e96f0b6a3d522dffd1fd5071fbd2584c5f88ec31 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; name="publickey - kreyren@rixotstudio.cz - 1677db82.asc"; filename="publickey - kreyren@rixotstudio.cz - 1677db82.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="publickey - kreyren@rixotstudio.cz - 1677db82.asc"; filename="publickey - kreyren@rixotstudio.cz - 1677db82.asc" LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgUFVCTElDIEtFWSBCTE9DSy0tLS0tClZlcnNpb246IEdvcGVuUEdQIDIu Mi4yCkNvbW1lbnQ6IGh0dHBzOi8vZ29wZW5wZ3Aub3JnCgp4ak1FWUFsM0ZoWUpLd1lCQkFIYVJ3 OEJBUWRBUUtBcG1kUjh0RzlhS0VkeHdISi9aS08yQ3ZaTVJXUHRCTk5HCnFKVWhwMkxOTDJ0eVpY bHlaVzVBY21sNGIzUnpkSFZrYVc4dVkzb2dQR3R5WlhseVpXNUFjbWw0YjNSemRIVmsKYVc4dVkz byt3bzhFRUJZS0FDQUZBbUFKZHhZR0N3a0hDQU1DQkJVSUNnSUVGZ0lCQUFJWkFRSWJBd0llQVFB aApDUkN0MDMwVXEwTDhxUlloQkJaMzI0S1RqS2hsYzRFakI2M1RmUlNyUXZ5cDU3UUEvMHRsYmRu Q0l6cmVLWG12ClcyWFNZWHpBSm90SmR4Q3pFK1hBVE0rcVBES3pBUUNjYkhwN3l3NitBcm5nZVN0 R0ZuL29saHhUUGRwdTY0MUMKTEdpZ1BtRW9CYzQ0QkdBSmR4WVNDaXNHQVFRQmwxVUJCUUVCQjBE YWlJM2pRZlNvaTNEWjQvTmZteEdkc1Jzdgo5L0JxTWdXNWo2amRCcWt5SUFNQkNBZkNlQVFZRmdn QUNRVUNZQWwzRmdJYkRBQWhDUkN0MDMwVXEwTDhxUlloCkJCWjMyNEtUaktobGM0RWpCNjNUZlJT clF2eXBIY0VCQU9ReFMvSi9VTTBlZThrMmpibGlXZC9RMElkK1g4VUgKQlhoeXFWUmMyMnFyQVFE TEhjVzk3V1FiU0pGbzE5a3d0NzBPeUhlcEY2TFdwREQwUHVJU1pENklDZz09Cj05a1pnCi0tLS0t RU5EIFBHUCBQVUJMSUMgS0VZIEJMT0NLLS0tLS0= --1eb42f16704d65615447e96f0b6a3d522dffd1fd5071fbd2584c5f88ec31-- --------1b5d6edfc0301c8e9f01e8de79edc095b52e51abb89fcc6b450f8a2dbe15bc4e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: ProtonMail wnUEARYIACcFAmG7/XEJkK3TfRSrQvypFqEEFnfbgpOMqGVzgSMHrdN9FKtC /KkAAEh5AP4pNPlYHeXTaxwEIASekRZrcYR8CgNz2Ckh04AWUwZXFgEAxJQJ okqCeN0r0n96aZh1WXoK6aqlwNB2URansqIWlAI= =8vAW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------1b5d6edfc0301c8e9f01e8de79edc095b52e51abb89fcc6b450f8a2dbe15bc4e--