From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Zelphir Kaltstahl Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Starting a GNU Guile awesome list Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 23:14:52 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87h7u9xp2i.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27744"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/68.8.0 To: guile-user@gnu.org, "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 15 23:15:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jvok9-00075s-AR for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 23:15:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46348 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jvok7-0004WR-Qf for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:15:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jvojy-0004WI-5v for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:14:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:35069) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jvojv-0006ex-Ib for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:14:57 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32EE42400FC for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 23:14:53 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1594847693; bh=FBrWgkJb/ert3a6U5J85oU4HssfOMUWArN/bZ+s02wc=; h=Subject:To:From:Date:From; b=HjJhcGmQrh8G/54OtAM+EKXHKFbPxID0baebmlGKAj0ErDivTmI0VOhklPHNnaY6y LCQilEboCHzGSuQ5HTMMo/ZvvyfwG+9O4zVwNR7f9RBwK5olxxyan14JdDxjwJo9z4 PfGTfGDhyZxjE4/LeS3mdtZySAx97brKiyUaw/XlNr20N5p83cl9fGr/4uIPshASh6 C2FlIX/NJqXG4qTYi2WG8dd+rOay/ThiqAZ4cbjQTITJgvI/DZDVt3GxROnue13TaO eqSKXuGCoEqSbrWgSszCXrMu1IB1OoRF/+uELMl89T8JhU+6Gf6vLPT/5dBUuZFW/0 wFwMOH6tFKqPQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4B6VWw33WTz6tmG; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 23:14:52 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87h7u9xp2i.fsf@web.de> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=zelphirkaltstahl@posteo.de; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/15 17:14:53 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:16692 Archived-At: Hi Arne, On 15.07.20 08:36, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Zelphir Kaltstahl writes: > >> One can write whole scientific books in org-mode > Or roleplaying books, which actually have higher requirements :-) > (I did both) > >>>> * Do you think license information should be written next to each it= em in the list? >>> First at foremost, the list _itself_ has to be licensed as a free doc= umentation. FWIW, most of =E2=80=98awesome lists=E2=80=99 are under CC0.= >> While the list is not CC0, I meant to put it under "GNU Free >> Documentation License v1.3", which I think should be appropriate (Is i= t >> not?) and free as in freedom. Good that you hint at the license, becau= se >> I thought it had a license already. > GFDL isn=E2=80=99t considered as free by the debian standards, because = it can > have invariant sections. CC by-sa might be a good fit, since it is > compatible with GPLv3 and wikipedia at the same time. > > Best wishes, > Arne Thanks for providing more info on the licenses. I just read multiple articles about GFDL and CC0 and still don't know what the better choice is for the list. In particular I do not find information about whether CC0 is copyleft or not (1), which perhaps means, that it is not and I do not understand the impact of invariant sections on the list (2). Can you help me out? Best regards, Zelphir --=20 repositories: https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl