From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dirk Herrmann Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: macros, procedure->macro Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:03:39 +0200 (CEST) Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026331438 20724 127.0.0.1 (10 Jul 2002 20:03:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17SNgs-0005O9-00 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:03:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17SNh3-0001DU-00; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:04:09 -0400 Original-Received: from sallust.ida.ing.tu-bs.de ([134.169.132.52]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17SNgf-0001Cr-00; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:03:45 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (dirk@localhost) by sallust.ida.ing.tu-bs.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA16770; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:03:39 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Neil Jerram In-Reply-To: Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:732 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:732 On 10 Jul 2002, Neil Jerram wrote: > I think the perhaps the point is not at what stage macro expansion > happens, but how universal it is. In other words, is macro expansion > performed universally like reading, and so only blocked by quoting, or > is it performed like evaluation, and so blocked/delayed by any number > of special forms including lambda and if. Ahh, I think I get your point. Currently, macro expansion is done like evaluation. However, I think we agree that this is broken. Therefore, I am currently working towards a solution (in tiny little steps, I admit), where macro expansion will be performed like reading (to use your words). Best regards, Dirk Herrmann _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user