From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user
Subject: Re: goops question
Date: 09 Jul 2002 22:17:00 +0100
Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <agfkun$mf6$2@main.gmane.org>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10207071043010.9685-100000@sallust.ida.ing.tu-bs.de>
	<87fzyu9iu0.fsf@zagadka.ping.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026250519 23014 127.0.0.1 (9 Jul 2002 21:35:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 21:35:19 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Dirk Herrmann <dirk@sallust.ida.ing.tu-bs.de>, guile-devel@gnu.org,
   guile-user@gnu.org
Return-path: <guile-user-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17S2di-0005z5-00
	for <guile-user@m.gmane.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 23:35:18 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17S2Sx-00081E-00; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 17:24:11 -0400
Original-Received: from mail.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.21] helo=s1.uklinux.net)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17S2Rz-0007yZ-00; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 17:23:11 -0400
Original-Received: from portalet.ossau.uklinux.net (ppp-0-26.lond-b-2.access.uk.tiscali.com [80.40.6.26])
	(authenticated)
	by s1.uklinux.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g69LMtd19572;
	Tue, 9 Jul 2002 22:22:55 +0100
Original-Received: from laruns.ossau.uklinux.net.ossau.uklinux.net (laruns.ossau.uklinux.net [192.168.1.3])
	by portalet.ossau.uklinux.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.2 (i386)) with ESMTP
	id EF3AE1705; Tue,  9 Jul 2002 22:22:50 +0000 (GMT)
Original-To: Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.ping.de>
Original-Lines: 15
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:guile-user@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user>,
	<mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General Guile related discussions <guile-user.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user>,
	<mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/guile-user/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:721
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:721

>>>>> "Marius" == Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.ping.de> writes:

    Marius> Dirk Herrmann <dirk@sallust.ida.ing.tu-bs.de> writes:
    >> "define-class, define-generic and define-accessor can only be used at the
    >> top level"

    Marius> I'm not calling myself an expert here, but I would say
    Marius> that it is very valid to use 'define-class' inside some
    Marius> lexical scope.  Just think of utility structs that are
    Marius> only used in one function.

Agreed, and it seems reasonable to me to use lexical generics (and so
accessors) as well.

        Neil


_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user