From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Dirk Herrmann <dirk@sallust.ida.ing.tu-bs.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user
Subject: SCM_RECKLESS
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 12:05:29 +0200 (CEST)
Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <afk0vf$nke$2@main.gmane.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025345327 24206 127.0.0.1 (29 Jun 2002 10:08:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 10:08:47 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <guile-user-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17OF9r-0006IJ-00
	for <guile-user@m.gmane.org>; Sat, 29 Jun 2002 12:08:47 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17OF7I-0000lZ-00; Sat, 29 Jun 2002 06:06:08 -0400
Original-Received: from sallust.ida.ing.tu-bs.de ([134.169.132.52])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17OF6g-0007lb-00; Sat, 29 Jun 2002 06:05:31 -0400
Original-Received: from localhost (dirk@localhost)
	by sallust.ida.ing.tu-bs.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA11242;
	Sat, 29 Jun 2002 12:05:29 +0200 (CEST)
Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org
Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:guile-user@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user>,
	<mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General Guile related discussions <guile-user.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user>,
	<mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/guile-user/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:670
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:670

Hi folks,

as with MEMOIZE_LOCALS, I also assume that all uses of the macro
SCM_RECKLESS can be safely removed:  Setting SCM_RECKLESS to true will
result in compiler errors.  Since noone has reported such errors yet, I
believe it is safe to assume that nobody uses that macro.  This means that
we can get rid of the macro and thus clean up the code by removing lots of
#ifdefs and avoid to maintain unused code in the future.

Best regards, 
Dirk Herrmann


_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user