From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: divoplade Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Guile web server example serving static files Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 10:54:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: <04e63ab3-93b7-a0fe-6db8-34f00e6098e0@posteo.de> <20200920074841.GA28825@tuxteam.de> <241003da760aff49d7e3a56ed6454f723f3a95b6.camel@divoplade.fr> <20200920082944.GB28825@tuxteam.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8163"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 Cc: Guile User To: tomas@tuxteam.de Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 20 10:56:04 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kJv8e-00020q-Gv for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 10:56:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56930 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJv8d-0000yN-Ih for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 04:56:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51356) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJv83-0000yC-9q for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 04:55:27 -0400 Original-Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:55889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJv7z-0007Mo-GS for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 04:55:27 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 86.194.83.229 Original-Received: from divoplade.home (lfbn-lyo-1-1007-229.w86-194.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.194.83.229]) (Authenticated sender: d@divoplade.fr) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 308F1E0003; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 08:55:18 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <20200920082944.GB28825@tuxteam.de> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.196; envelope-from=d@divoplade.fr; helo=relay4-d.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/20 04:55:20 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:16928 Archived-At: Le dimanche 20 septembre 2020 à 10:29 +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de a écrit : > > I did not recommend using this term. There was a question in the > source > > code asking why guile used a different terminology; I put the > > explanation why, with the relevant citation (because the section is > > huge). That's all. > > Don't get me wrong: I think your hint is relevant and appropriate. It > makes sense to keep a consistent terminology whithin one context. Then I don't understand what hint you are discussing. > we should keep in mind that others use a slightly different > terminology Yes, that's why I try to clarify where the strange "file name" terminology comes from.