From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bill Gribble Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: [d.love@dl.ac.uk: dynamic loading of native code modules] Date: 14 May 2002 11:11:12 -0500 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <878z7rqfrg.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87znztllbx.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021392834 6165 127.0.0.1 (14 May 2002 16:13:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 16:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 177evx-0001bD-00 for ; Tue, 14 May 2002 18:13:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 177euH-0007jO-00; Tue, 14 May 2002 12:12:09 -0400 Original-Received: from grib.customer.jump.net ([216.30.103.2] helo=firewall.linuxdevelopersgroup.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 177etV-0007ep-00; Tue, 14 May 2002 12:11:22 -0400 Original-Received: from flophouse.internal.billgribble.com (unknown [192.168.0.66]) by firewall.linuxdevelopersgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F62BFEE; Tue, 14 May 2002 11:11:21 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by flophouse.internal.billgribble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5A389F8B; Tue, 14 May 2002 11:11:13 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: ttn@glug.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:415 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:415 On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 05:57, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote: > it looks like a plan to just implement something and throw it against > the wall to see if it sticks. in particular, having the interface > number encoded in the name doesn't sound like fun for anyone. For someone who spends so much time hopping up and down about process and development culture, you sure don't hesitate to start throwing around derogatory and inflammatory language. Put a cork in it, please! Language like this makes you part of the problem, not part of the solution. The whole idea of encoding interface numbers in the name was explicitly and exclusively a temporary hack. It certainly wasn't proposed by _anybody_ as a final solution. b.g. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user