From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: [d.love@dl.ac.uk: dynamic loading of native code modules] Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 18:35:22 -0700 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87sn5l55us.fsf@alice.rhinosaur.lan> <87sn5khlub.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <0204291926190H.10649@locke.free-expression.org> Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020130969 18324 127.0.0.1 (30 Apr 2002 01:42:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 01:42:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rlb@defaultvalue.org, guile-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 172MfJ-0004lR-00 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 03:42:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 172Med-0005xn-00; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 21:42:07 -0400 Original-Received: from ca-crlsbd-u5-c4a-a-172.crlsca.adelphia.net ([24.48.214.172] helo=giblet) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 172Mc1-0005mp-00; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 21:39:25 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by giblet with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 172MY6-0002fd-00; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 18:35:22 -0700 Original-To: owinebar@free-expression.org In-Reply-To: <0204291926190H.10649@locke.free-expression.org> (message from Lynn Winebarger on Mon, 29 Apr 2002 19:26:19 -0500) Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:372 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:372 From: Lynn Winebarger Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 19:26:19 -0500 This is an interesting policy. Is it documented somewhere? I take it the reason is because it's easier to develop the C libraries that way. dude, you buzzkill cuz-we-can (bfd). what makes C libraries easy to develop and install? [cc guile-user] thi _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user