From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Rottmann Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: [d.love@dl.ac.uk: dynamic loading of native code modules] Date: 24 Apr 2002 20:10:51 +0200 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87ads6nf1v.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87it6s7sjz.fsf@alice.rhinosaur.lan> <87662hkvya.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <20020424145130.GC17392@www> <87y9fd5dsj.fsf@alice.rhinosaur.lan> <87vgahjdwc.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <1019664949.936.80.camel@flophouse> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019671993 20560 127.0.0.1 (24 Apr 2002 18:13:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 18:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 170RGT-0005LV-00 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:13:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 170RFu-0007M4-00; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:12:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 170REs-0007K4-00 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:11:35 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 22656 invoked by uid 0); 24 Apr 2002 18:11:32 -0000 Original-Received: from m184p020.adsl.highway.telekom.at (HELO alice.rhinosaur.lan) (62.47.190.244) by mail.gmx.net (mp016-rz3) with SMTP; 24 Apr 2002 18:11:32 -0000 Original-Received: from andy by alice.rhinosaur.lan with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 170REB-0002XS-00; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:10:51 +0200 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <1019664949.936.80.camel@flophouse> Original-Lines: 27 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:284 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:284 Bill Gribble writes: > On Wed, 2002-04-24 at 10:48, Rob Browning wrote: > > You mean -rpath? That might be a possibility, though it's (at least > > used to be) against Debian Policy -- there's usually a good reason, > > but I'd have to go check to be sure what the rationale was, and of > > course it might no longer apply... > > I think this is part of the whole "install tree != Real Install Tree" > thing, isn't it? i.e. doing 'make install' into a sandbox, then > un-rooting and packaging up the resulting tree? seems like -rpath into > the final destination could cause some problems with that ... > About -rpath: se my other mail. I think this is not really an issue, since you can ./configure with --prefix=/real/install/prefix, meaning /real/install/prefix is compiled into the library (via #define) and then do 'make install prefix=/stage/dir' without problems, given that in the final installation (using a .deb or .rpm, for instance) the thing is put into /real/install/prefix. Regards, Andy -- Andreas Rottmann | Dru@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user