From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Rottmann Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: [d.love@dl.ac.uk: dynamic loading of native code modules] Date: 24 Apr 2002 20:06:19 +0200 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87ads6nf1v.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87it6s7sjz.fsf@alice.rhinosaur.lan> <87662hkvya.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <20020424145130.GC17392@www> <87y9fd5dsj.fsf@alice.rhinosaur.lan> <87vgahjdwc.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019671807 20246 127.0.0.1 (24 Apr 2002 18:10:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 18:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 170RDS-0005GO-00 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:10:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 170RCU-0007AD-00; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:09:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 170RAU-00070u-00 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 23580 invoked by uid 0); 24 Apr 2002 18:06:59 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO alice.rhinosaur.lan) (62.47.190.244) by mail.gmx.net (mp016-rz3) with SMTP; 24 Apr 2002 18:06:59 -0000 Original-Received: from andy by alice.rhinosaur.lan with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 170R9n-0002XH-00; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:06:19 +0200 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87vgahjdwc.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> Original-Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:283 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:283 Rob Browning writes: > Andreas Rottmann writes: > > > I fully agree. However, I don't think manipulation of > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH is even necessary, since one can compile the > > directory (e.g. /usr/local/lib/guile1.7.0) into the guile > > interpreter/shared lib. > > You mean -rpath? That might be a possibility, though it's (at least > used to be) against Debian Policy -- there's usually a good reason, > but I'd have to go check to be sure what the rationale was, and of > course it might no longer apply... > No, here we talk about extension .so files, don't we? These are loaded via libltdl (which has ugly error messages, by the way) and thus one can specify the directory to load the lib from. Andy -- Andreas Rottmann | Dru@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user